Re: Unit Entitlments | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R Philip Dowds (rphilipdowds![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 11:35:19 -0700 (PDT) |
“Fair” is a tough one: Unit size can be taken as a rough proxy for wealth and income; but per person tends to be a pay-as-you-go, per-use ethic (not an “we’re all in this together” communitarian concept); and any fee that's the same for each instance — like a $2.50 toll or a $50 marriage license — falls regressively more heavily on lower-income parties. ??? At Cornerstone in Cambridge, we have our own complexity of fee calculation, some of which is due to a physical plant that includes both row houses and apartment buildings. But our biggest worry remains that rising costs might drive out a valued friend and neighbor … which sometimes trends toward postponing maintenance and replacement projects. We’ve not yet found any model of fee jiggery-pokery that translates reliably into progressive taxation. Thanks, RPD > On Jul 7, 2024, at 8:25 AM, Zev Paiss <zevpaiss [at] gmail.com> wrote: > > At Nomad Cohousing our monthly dues are set using three factors. Many costs > are divided equally, some are calculated by home size and a third set are > created by number of people. It is more complex but we feel more fair. > > Zev Paiss > Boulder, Colorado and Nosara, Costa Rica > 720-232-3826 > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > >
-
Unit Entitlments Zev Paiss, July 7 2024
- Re: Unit Entitlments R Philip Dowds, July 7 2024
- Re: Unit Entitlments Elizabeth Rosenau, July 7 2024
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.