Re: making cohousing affordable | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Katie Henry (katie-henry![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 13:49:36 -0800 (PST) |
Sophie raises several excellent points. All of the links I provided were new or very recent construction. I totally agree that anything built pre-COVID will have very different financials. Many of the listings were for brand new, unoccupied buildings, which I thought was interesting. I guess builders in this region are now building speculative apartment buildings and marketing them to investors/landlords? Katie Henry Heartwood Commons - Tulsa ---------------------- Sophie Rubin wrote: Buying existing buildings is a great idea but beware: 1) the price of existing multi family has *nothing* and I mean *nothing* to do with current construction prices!! It has to do with income generated by the property. Anything you build new in any jurisdiction in the US right now will *not* be competitive against existing units.2) tenants’ rights. I suspect this is why we have not yet seen many existing buildings purchased for cohousing: communitarians either cannot or will not evict current residents. At best, this slows down the cohousing “development” process to the speed of natural turnover.It does seem to me like a more viable option for forming communities now, understanding how long and how difficult new, purpose-built development is.
- Re: making cohousing affordable, (continued)
-
Re: making cohousing affordable Sophie Rubin, January 30 2025
- Re: making cohousing affordable Shane Strano, January 30 2025
- Re: making cohousing affordable Shane Strano, January 30 2025
- Re: making cohousing affordable Sharon Villines, January 30 2025
- Re: making cohousing affordable Katie Henry, January 30 2025
- Re: making cohousing affordable Sharon Villines, January 30 2025
-
Re: making cohousing affordable Sophie Rubin, January 30 2025
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.