| Re: Number of "users" in Senior Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Linda Hobbet (coho |
|
| Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 15:07:09 -0800 (PST) | |
Another reason for not filling 20% with occupants younger than 55 is
that in a given year you could have some unoccupied units so that fewer
than 80% are occupied by at least one person 55 or older and you could
lose your 55+ status permanently. It is the occupants that count, not
the owners. Unoccupied units don't count.
People leaving seem to go in waves. At one point we had 4 units up for sale and some of them were unoccupied. I believe there is a grace period during the initial sales and occupation, but these were all resales. At the same time we also had one person who was away for a year's sabbatical and her home was unoccupied while she was gone.
Linda Hobbet On 12/1/2025 3:32 AM, Linda Hobbet wrote:
At least 80% of the units need at least 1 occupant aged 55 or older. They don't have to be the head of the household. The law was written that way so if the older person died or moved to a nursing home or something, a remaining person who was under 55 would not be forced to move out.
--
VillageHearthCohousing.com
706-202-7178
coho [at] lindahobbet.com
"When you plant a seed of love, it is you that blooms.”
Ma Jaya
-
Number of "users" in Senior Cohousing Joel Bartlett, November 30 2025
-
Re: Number of "users" in Senior Cohousing Linda Hobbet, December 1 2025
- Re: Number of "users" in Senior Cohousing Linda Hobbet, December 1 2025
- Re: Number of "users" in Senior Cohousing Lynn Eisenbrey, December 2 2025
-
Re: Number of "users" in Senior Cohousing Linda Hobbet, December 1 2025
-
Re: Number of "users" in Senior Cohousing Sharon Villines, December 1 2025
- Re: Number of "users" in Senior Cohousing Linda Hobbet, December 1 2025
- Re: Number of "users" in Senior Cohousing Joel Bartlett, December 1 2025
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.