| Re: reversion to or change to traditional consensus model for governance? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Fred-List manager (fholson |
|
| Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 05:11:54 -0800 (PST) | |
Chris Roth - Communities Editor <editor [at] gen-us.net> is the author of the message below. It was posted by Fred of the Cohousing-L management team <cohousing-l-owner [at] cohousing.org> due to a posting problem. It was originally sent Feb 12. It is a reply to a post that can be read in the acrhives: Subj:reversion to or change to traditional consensus model for governance? https://lists.cohousing.org/pipermail/cohousing-l/msg51970.html -------------------- FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS -------------------- Hi Sophie and all, This seems as good a time as any to mention the new issue of Communities, "Leadership, Democracy, and Autocracy." A number of its stories involve groups using consensus of various stripes, including one whose path somewhat fits the general pattern you describe (abandoning then returning to consensus-based decision-making). More info is at https://www.gen-us.net/210 and the issue is available at https://www.gen-us.net/210order . Here's a description: Communities#210, Spring 2026, "Leadership, Democracy, and Autocracy," explores how communities address questions of authority, influence, governance, and power. Stories trace the heydays and falls of three different charismatic leaders whose groups’ identities were deeply intertwined with their own. On the other end of the spectrum, authors describe cooperative projects where no one was “in charge” and in fact nothing was compulsory, but everything got done. Articles depict decision-making systems spanning the spectrum from committed egalitarianism with no hierarchy, to merit- and seniority-weighted influence, to power concentrated in a small group. We discuss different versions and adaptations of consensus, the impacts of landlord-tenant dynamics, and what a community’s attitude toward disagreement and conflict says about its social health and long-term viability. We also hear about one group which slid from democracy toward autocracy, melted down, then ultimately recovered its democracy—both a cautionary tale and inspiring proof that the road to oligarchy and kakistocracy does not need to be one-way or forever. -- Chris Roth Editor, Communities 81868 Lost Valley Lane Dexter, OR 97431 editor [at] gen-us.net 541-937-5221 gen-us.net/communities for Communities advertising, please contact Joyce Bressler: ads [at] gen-us.net 845-558-4492
-
reversion to or change to traditional consensus model for governance? Sophie Rubin, February 11 2026
- Re: reversion to or change to traditional consensus model for governance? Fred-List manager, February 18 2026
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.