Re: bylaws/lenders/consensus/cost allocation | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Pablo Halpern (phalpernworld.std.com) | |
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 94 11:35 CDT |
> From: Judy <BAXTER%EPIHUB [at] VX.CIS.UMN.EDU> > > Now one of our members has been > by a friend at New View (Francie or Franny or some such name?) that NV ha > consensus in their bylaws and no problems with lenders. Any info? ideas > others? It was probably Franny. New View currently has consensus in our bylaws, but we haven't made the transistion yet from a development organization to a condominium. Our legal committee is currently drafting condo docs and I believe that consensus is not part of them. Instead, things like consensus will be part of the "house rules." I'm not sure what the final outcome will be. I'd like to see consensus right in the official documents, FNMA may prevent that. > 2.Allocation of shared operating costs/reserve funds. Seems like that go > the bylaws too - and our lawyer is saying we should stay away from anythi > complex, anything but per unit or per square feet. Again, I don't know what we will evenatually end up with. I think the guiding rule is to leave the formative documents as vague as possible, spelling out the documents in more flexible "rules and regulations." - Pablo ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pablo Halpern phalpern [at] world.std.com (508) 435-5274 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
bylaws/lenders/consensus/cost allocation Judy, August 22 1994
- Re: bylaws/lenders/consensus/cost allocation Pablo Halpern, August 23 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.