Re: Cost Apportionment of Infrastructure | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Judy (BAXTER%EPIHUBVX.CIS.UMN.EDU) | |
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 94 11:41 CST |
RAYGASSER [at] delphi.com wrote (Nov 14) asking about ways of divying up common acquisition costs. I hesitate to jump into this - as far as I can see, there is no way to do this that is clearly "fair". At MoCoCo we delegated this task to a small group, and then the proposals were evaluated at a meeting I missed, so I can't say a lot about the rationale. Basically, Common Space costs (and development costs) are being allocated partly based on "footprint", ( I think that's 50%), and partly based on finished + 1/2 unfinished square footage.** ) This all includes the cost of all the land, the cost of the commons house, architects, PR, surveys, appraisals, tunnels, walkways, etc. etc. etc. I assume footprint comes out closer to per household than per sq foot. And basically I think the idea is a mixture. Somehow, seems unfair to charge 1 or 2 persons in a small unit as much as a family of 5 in a large one - but also unfair? inequitable? to charge only by sq footage and put so much cost onto larger units/households. I wouldn't say I *recommend* this solution, but I can live with it. Judy Baxter, Monterey Cohousing Community, (MoCoCo) Twin Cities Area, Minneapolis/St.Paul Minnesota e-mail: baxter [at] epivax.epi.umn.edu
- Re: Cost Apportionment of Infrastructure, (continued)
- Re: Cost Apportionment of Infrastructure Ian Higginbottom, November 15 1994
- RE: Cost Apportionment of Infrastructure Rob Sandelin, November 16 1994
- RE: Cost Apportionment of Infrastructure Ian Higginbottom, November 20 1994
- Re: Cost Apportionment of Infrastructure David Hungerford, November 23 1994
- Re: Cost Apportionment of Infrastructure Judy, November 23 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.