Re: Environmentally disadvantaged sites | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: RSchmidt65 (RSchmidt65aol.com) | |
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 95 00:35 CST |
Hi everyone! First I'd like to introduce myself. My name is Rita Schmidt and I've been lurking in this group for the past four weeks or so which is roughly the length of time since I first stumbled across the cohousing concept in the form of "the bible" lying on my sister's coffee table. Through a subscription to Cohousing magazine (following up on your plug for it.) I was lucky enough to locate a well developed group in my area (Penninsula Housing Partners) and I'll probably sign up at the next meeting. This group has extensive plans to develop a 2 acre site on which they plan to put eighteen townhouses though they have not yet arranged the financing. The site in question abuts a freeway which is one of the major arteries for this region. The cars will be roaring by about 25 yards from the closest dwelling. This highway is also the site of a lot of congestion during the peak hours. Keeping in mind that land in this area is extremely expensive and scarce and that their search has dragged on for years, I am still worried about the effect that proximity to the freeway will have on the development. The noise is loud enough that city regulations require a sound barrier. But, in order to preserve access to the creek which runs along the highway the group has elected to use the back group of townhouses as a barrier (The plan is for a circle of homes around a central common with the common house at the front of the site.) rather than put in a berm or sound wall (probably still debatable). There are also high tension power lines running along the back of the site. I am curious to know if any other groups out there have settled for similarly environmentally disadvantaged sites and if so what the impact has been on the success of the cohousing concept under those circumstances or what anyone imagines the impact would be. I'm afraid that if the noise were bad enough it would prevent people from hanging out on the common or their front porches and that the "car-free" site concept would become simply ironic. Certainly the site won't have the peace and idyll that seems important to a sense of community. I'd appreciate your thoughts on the subject (PHP people too). I know that more than one household is hesitating to join because of this very point. Thanks. -Rita (RSchmidt65 [at] aol.com)
-
Re: Environmentally disadvantaged sites RSchmidt65, January 24 1995
- Re: Re: Environmentally disadvantaged sites tom ponessa, January 25 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.