Re: Cohousing Alternative -Reply | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Shava Nerad (shavanetwork-services.uoregon.edu) | |
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 16:13:27 -0700 (PDT) |
> My impression is that one of the factors that distinguishes cohousing from > other forms of intentional community is its inclusiveness. I understand > that if someone in a cohousing place moves out, the others have no say as > to who buys the house and moves in to replace them. The only admissions > group would be mortgage lenders, and they are not cohousing residents. > > Anyone out there who can tell me if my impression is accurate, otherwise, > or does it vary for different existing groups? My impression is that cohousing is based on a social/architectural/ economic idea, not whether the participating group was intentional or not. The covenants for resale are a legal thing that could be varied (at the cost of $75-150/hr...;) community by community. Shava Nerad shava [at] ns.uoregon.edu
- Re: Cohousing Alternative -Reply, (continued)
- Re: Cohousing Alternative -Reply 'Judith Wisdom, August 4 1995
- Re: Cohousing Alternative -Reply William Dean, August 7 1995
- Re: Cohousing Alternative -Reply JoycePlath, August 7 1995
- Re: Cohousing Alternative -Reply Pablo Halpern, August 8 1995
- Re: Cohousing Alternative -Reply Shava Nerad, August 8 1995
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.