RE: In favor of a co-developer / Wonderland Homes | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Marci Malinowycz (SoDancemsn.com) | |
Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 01:12:38 -0500 |
A correction for you: Puget Ridge Cohousing was built without "co-development assisitance". We were our own developer. We benefitted from the fortunate situation of having highly talented members who gave a great deal of time to the project. One member was paid by the group, with payment deferred until completion; however, he put in many more hours than he was compensated for. ---------- From: cohousing-l [at] mtn.org on behalf of Rich Lobdill Sent: Sunday, May 12, 1996 10:39 PM Subject: In favor of a co-developer / Wonderland Homes . . . 2) Every cohousing community built so far has had co-development assistance (risk taking) from either the public or private sector. . . .
-
In favor of a co-developer / Wonderland Homes Rich Lobdill, May 12 1996
- RE: In favor of a co-developer / Wonderland Homes Marci Malinowycz, May 28 1996
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.