Re: pushing the envelope | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Scott Cowley (scowleyaclis.lib.utah.edu) | |
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 1997 10:59:47 -0600 |
Thanks to John Poteet of Chico for sharing his insights! He is so right about the city planners. We're lucky we have one as a member! As a community, we will probably be able to help with experimentation on some of the new technologies in a practical way. One of which we are paying extra to try is "R-Control panels", a "stress-skin" construction method which gets away from stud framing. Philip Proefrock also begins an awfully important thread from my point of view. Here in our little valley we have just about run out of land thanks to the ravenous appetites of the 30 or so suburb developers. Therefore, the question turns to retrofit. An idea is to buy existing suburban housing, put a pedestrian path in the backyards, plow up the roads in the front yards, and physically _connect_ a few of the houses together, periodically, in order to come up with local, smaller-scale systems for say...schools, or...homes, or...commonhouses! Minibuses would connect the smaller schools (as well as neighbors) to regional facilities such as gyms, labs, libraries, other programs, etc., thus discouraging the problem of too big a human scale (the public school-as-factory). This is what I call leftist thinking. Thanks. Zippity Doo Dah...
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.