consensus | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: barbara keppel (71612.340compuserve.com) | |
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 10:27:26 -0600 |
As a former member of the Portland, MAINE, cohousing group, I can testify that one reason I dropped out (after 3 years) was that the group couldn't agree to take consensus training. Meetings were unnecessarily interminable and frustrating. Since then, I served several years on the board of a very small local non profit organization whose chair insisted on operating by consensus, mostly because he was raised a Quaker. Unfortunately, because he learned consensus by osmosis, he didn't seem to be able to give us all of the rules/techniques we needed, and we couldn't seem to settle any controversial matter. When I finally got more of the information I needed (from someone on the internet) and was satisfied that the board couldn't decide to have training, I left the board along with several other members. So, what did I learn? Get training. Practice. Get more training. CT is from this area. I hear good reports of his work. BobBI
- RE: Consensus, (continued)
- RE: Consensus Legal-All Lawyers, March 19 1996
- RE: Consensus Michael John Omogrosso, March 19 1996
- Re: Consensus Stephen R. Figgins, March 22 1996
- re: Consensus Buzz Burrell, July 1 1996
- consensus barbara keppel, December 10 1997
- Re: Consensus Ruby44444, December 12 1997
- Re: Consensus Ruby44444, December 12 1997
- RE: Consensus Rob Sandelin, December 13 1997
- Re: Consensus Ruby44444, April 29 1998
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.