| Re: Involuntary Simplicity-self selection | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Lynn Nadeau (welcome |
|
| Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 20:32:24 -0600 (MDT) | |
On the subject of house sizes:
At RoseWind, a lot-development model, the lots are all about the same
size, but people can build according to their taste and budget. So what
did they choose?
Of 22 homes built, or designed for building this year, figuring on the
number of rooms a realtor could claim were bedrooms, we have
1 BR (4) typically 800-1000 sq ft, one story
2 BR (9) typically 1200-1600 sq ft, two story
3 BR (3)
4 BR (5) 3-4 BRs typically 1800-2300 sq ft, on two or three levels (a
number of our lots are on a slope, with daylight-basement lower levels)
Of the 8 three- and four-bedroom homes, 5 are counting an apartment that
is part of the house ("accessory dwelling unit" or "in-law" unit), and 5
are using a 'bedroom' as a home office. Of the 22 homes total, 12 are
using one or more "bedrooms" for other purposes: sewing, guest, art
studio, office.
51 BR total, of which 21 are being used for other than daily sleeping
rooms.
This might shed some light on the question of whether if a group builds a
larger home, with a large family in mind, they might have trouble finding
a buyer for it on resale.
This is of course also influenced by local real estate costs and income
levels. We're in an area where homes cost about $100-200,000 to build,
and the common buy-in cost, for land, infrastructure, common house
construction, etc has been about $28-38,000. A number of our owners came
here upon retiring and selling a home in a nearby big city, at a handsome
profit. A number of our owners have lowered their construction costs by
helping to build their homes themselves, as well.
Lynn Nadeau, RoseWind Cohousing , Port Townsend WA
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.