Re: Seniority-Much Ado About Nothing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Dahako (Dahako![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 07:36:53 -0700 (MST) |
Liz - I have two hats on this, because I live in cohousing and I work on community development and affordable housing grant programs for HUD. After years in this field, my early ideology has been tempered into a directed pragmatism - here at Eno Commons,we educated a lot of people during our marketing, we continue to educate ourselves and our friends and family and our kids schoolmates, we showed a conventional builder how to incorporate a few new green technologies and still make a little money. That's a lot, in my experience, for any one development. Although our neighborhood used no HUD funds, not even an FHA mortgage, we did manage to bring the home prices in at about the median new construction price even though our homes had substantial green building/passive solar technologies built into them. Not every possible technology on the market - we had cost constraints - but solidly better than the norm in our market. We have owners and renters, and the income levels in our community vary between the poles of households who could qualify for every grant program I work on and those who must be worth 10 or 15 times our thresholds. That doesn't happen every day in American neighborhoods. I think the trickier part is remembering to keep reaching out and not let one's community become an enclave. I am strongly in Scott Peck's camp on this - any group whose membership boundary is difficult or impermeable is not and acannot be a community. Such a group is an enclave. To be a community, to Peck and to me, is to be inclusive in theory and practice. Incidentally, I had discussions along these lines with several black prospective members along the way. None of them joined - and I still feel this as a boundary problem to be solved: I live in a city with a large black middle class and no black cohousing neighbors, despite interest from several households. Not that I know the way to do it - I do puzzle over it often. On the work side, I have one local government staffer who is so intrigued with the cohousing neighborhood in her midst that she is working on helping another one get started. Because she is using HUD grant funds (CDBG)some of the units will have to be affordable to households with lower incomes. The fair housing rules discussed here from time to time must be affirmatively enforced. She can draw on HUD resources through the Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing (PATH) to try out some sustainable design and building techniques. (Actually, PATH is a multi-agency and National Association of Homebuilders effort that has showcased several cohousing neighborhoods in its publications) I guess what I'm trying to say is that all is not lost. Cohousing is an idea that is changing people's minds and helping to changing housing patterns in the U.S. Just maybe more slowly than you'd hoped. Keep pushing. Jessie Handforth Kome Eno Commons Durham, NC Where we're working on finding another good neighbor to buy a three bedroom house kitty-corner across the pedway from me. We're also about to have a design charrette to update our site plan, design our pedway and some drainage, and eat lots of good food together.
- Re: Seniority-Much Ado About Nothing, (continued)
- Re: Seniority-Much Ado About Nothing Berrins, October 31 2000
- Re: Seniority-Much Ado About Nothing Hans Tilstra, October 31 2000
- Re: Seniority-Much Ado About Nothing lilbert, October 31 2000
- Re: Seniority-Much Ado About Nothing lilbert, October 31 2000
- Re: Seniority-Much Ado About Nothing Dahako, November 1 2000
- Re: Seniority-Much Ado About Nothing lilbert, November 1 2000
- Re: Seniority-Much Ado About Nothing Diane Simpson, November 1 2000
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.