Re: Cohousing-L digest, Vol 1 #440 - 13 msgs | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Alicianat (Alicianataol.com) | |
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:00:02 -0700 (MST) |
Sorry for the apparent contradiction. My point is this. Discussion is a great way to sift through good and not so good ideas. As I understood it, someone proposed a solution of banning service animals. If I had a service dog/animal, and knew that people in my community were meeting to consider banning my dog, I would not feel particularly comfortable or welcome. Perhaps this is the same as suggesting that air quality is an individual problems and, " If you can't breathe in a public space, stay home." Obviously niether is a desirable proposition -- or a very inclusive or welcoming solution. Thank you for the opportunity to clarify. << >Banning service dogs, or in any way making them unwelcome by making it even >an issue for discussion, is in my perspective, very unaccepting and >inappropriate. I find this somewhat contradictory, and I wonder if Alicia would clarify the disctinction between welcome and unwelcoming discussion? >> _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
-
Re: Cohousing-L digest, Vol 1 #440 - 13 msgs Alicianat, March 28 2002
- Service Dogs Sharon Villines, March 29 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.