Re: consensus and majority vote | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (jnpalme![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:50:01 -0600 (MDT) |
Racheli Sonora Cohousing Queues for speaking drive me nuts, for example, when 6 >people speak on the basis of incorrect information before someone is >"allowed" to correct their assumptions. Points of Information always take >precedence. You can't continue a discussion without correct information. There are consensus procedures which resolve this problem, easily. I'm just mentioning it so that queues are not taken to be part of the definition of what consensus is. R. ----------------------------------------------------------- jnpalme [at] attglobal.net (Racheli Gai) ----------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Re: consensus and majority vote, (continued)
-
Re: consensus and majority vote Sharon Villines, July 18 2002
-
Re: consensus and majority vote Gary.Stewart, July 18 2002
- Re: consensus and majority vote Sharon Villines, July 19 2002
-
Re: consensus and majority vote Gary.Stewart, July 18 2002
-
Re: consensus and majority vote Sharon Villines, July 18 2002
- Re: consensus and majority vote Racheli Gai, July 18 2002
-
Re: consensus and majority vote Sharon Villines, July 18 2002
-
Re: consensus and majority vote cscheuer, July 18 2002
- Re: consensus and majority vote Racheli Gai, July 18 2002
- Re: consensus and majority vote cscheuer, July 18 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.