Re: Hiring an Architect | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharonsharonvillines.com) | |
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 12:26:01 -0700 (MST) |
10 reasons why you want to hire an experienced developer and have an ironclad contract that stipulates penalties for lack of performance: 1. The architect's recommendations turn out to be based on reputation, not fact. People said, "He knows all there is to know about green building" when the "people" knew nothing themselves. Even knowing what "green" means is more than they knew. What people told you was based on the PR distributed by the architect. 2. Before your plans are complete, the architect decides to get married and have a baby and move to another house -- one they are building and supervising. No phone calls answered for weeks and weeks at a time. 3. To speed up the process, plans are sent to the engineers _after_ copies are made so when the engineer finds the buildings can't be built as specified, the architect has to make corrections and charges you for all the recopying which is substantial. 4. Zoning board finds that the inground work does not match the present sewer system connections or meet specifications for drainage so all the foundations have to be redesigned in order to connect to water, sewer, etc. 5. Architect closes their own office (no surprise) and joins a firm that actually expects them to submit plans on time so your project goes on the back burner again. Phone is disconnected. If you complain to the firm, you may never get your plans. 6. Finally delivered, each page of the four sets of architectural drawings (3 x 4 foot sheets), each set with at least 30-50 pages floor plans, elevations, and mechanical systems has an error that the architect denies is their error. It takes the entire design team weeks of sorting through old messages and communications to demonstrate that the architect did not keep careful notes. 7. The engineers and the builder disagree on whether the structure can be built as designed. Sub-contractors refuse to submit bids because they can't guarantee their work. 8. Engineers fix problems but new drawings have to be paid for before they are released and before it is decided who is responsible for these costs. The investing members are now well over $175,000 in debt with no workable plan for actual construction. 9. Subcontractors' bids come in 50% higher than originally estimated by the builder. Builder says this is normal. Inflation during the three year delay and the steel beams required by the "innovative" design account for all the increases. No chance of lowering costs. 10. Architect does not consider staying under budget his or her responsibility. "That is the responsibility of the builder. I did what you asked." 11. Project folds. People lose all money invested. I am be off in some of the details here and there but this actually happened to one project. Always work with experienced professionals who know what they are doing. Do not take chances on members of your group who always dreamed of designing a building and will work for free or at reduced costs. Be clear about legal obligations and enforce them. Successful bankers and business people are not conservatives for nothing. Sharon -- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.communityforum.net/mailman/listinfo/cohousing-l
- Hiring an Architect, (continued)
- Hiring an Architect Robert Arjet, October 31 2002
- RE: Hiring an Architect Casey Morrigan, October 31 2002
- Re: Hiring an Architect Kay Argyle, October 31 2002
- Re: Hiring an Architect Sharon Villines, October 31 2002
- Re: Hiring an Architect Sharon Villines, November 1 2002
- Re: Hiring an Architect Laura Fitch, A.I.A., November 4 2002
- Re: Hiring an Architect Sharon Villines, November 4 2002
- Re: guns and cigarettes Ann Zabaldo, October 28 2002
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.