Re: Individual versus group needs and wants | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Tree Bressen (treeic.org) | |
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 23:44:02 -0700 (MST) |
Dear "Mary," >I love the theory and philosophy of consensus. Everyone is heard, all >opinions are respected etc., etc., However........ > >How about a group member who sounds like a broken record - same thing over >and over again. Things are complicated by the member not having a terrific >memory for facts, resorting to hyperbolic language and often being out of >the information loop (not on e-mail) by choice. I'm sure someone will tell >me that the reason this is continuing to happen must be because the person >obviously has not REALLY been heard, not listened to with respect etc., > >How about the person who knows they have been heard when the group does as >they say, and until the group does the particular action or makes a certain >decision they will continue to go on ad nauseum. I.e "I know I have been >heard when the group does what I ask". What do you do then? > >Add to that new members who have not heard the cry before and when they see >a member in this state immediately want to fix things for the person. > >Add this to the already challenging, risky, exhausting, time consuming and >stressful development stage and you've got a perfect recipe for head >banging. It does sound like a really frustrating situation! Have you had a direct (yet compassionate) conversation with the individual about it? In particular, have you talked about the difference between hearing someone and agreeing with them, and asked the person what it would take besides agreement for them to feel heard? I mean getting something measurable and specific, like "I know i've been heard when you can paraphrase what i said back to me" or "when it's written on the list of ideas" or something else that works for them. Perhaps you can use an example of a time when that person was in the other role, the role of hearing someone but not agreeing with them, to demonstrate? Have you asked them what would work for them that they think would also meet the other needs that have been expressed (and which you might need to have handy on a list on a flip chart for the person to look at, especially if their memory isn't solid)? Another suggestion is to talk things over with the person ahead of time, let them know what proposals are coming up and how they might turn out so the person can get used to the idea for a while before participating in a meeting about it. Harder during the rush of development, i know, and it's frustrating when you'd rather they just read email like others, but still it might be worth trying. Hope some of those ideas help, --Tree ----------------------------------------------- Tree Bressen 1680 Walnut St. Eugene, OR 97403 (541) 484-1156 tree [at] ic.org http://www.treegroup.info _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Indiana Cohousing Group Forming, (continued)
- Indiana Cohousing Group Forming Megan Moss, February 11 2003
-
Head-banging & our new "Round-tabling" Manual sbraun, February 12 2003
- Re: [C-L] Consensus and Sociocracy Sharon Villines, February 12 2003
- Individual dysfunctions in the group Rob Sandelin, February 12 2003
- Re: Individual versus group needs and wants Tree Bressen, February 20 2003
- Re: Interpreting Sharon's" individual vs. group" statements Kay Argyle, February 18 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.