RE: overburdened "kool-aid" mom | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (floriferousmsn.com) | |
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:14:01 -0600 (MDT) |
My house is home to 8 girls. Two of them are my own children. At times there are 8 girls here, with music blaring, popcorn etc. At times there are no girls, and most the time there are just my two. It is a trade off. When they are at my house they get fed usually and hang out under our rules. When MY kids are gone, somebody else is feeding them and they are under their rules. To make our lives sort of make sense, the parents of all these girls have had some conversations to set our mutual rules in order, which pretty much get followed. These girls are close as sisters, have all kinds of dramas (especially when the BOY moved in-But that's another story). The moms have done a sort of group celebration with them especially at their first "moon time". (They are all teens, pre-teens). I sometimes kick them out of our house if its too loud and I need quiet, no offense taken, they just migrate somewhere else. They all monitor each other, talk girl stuff endlessly, share clothes, makeup, boyfriend advice. Each of the parents over time has taken the tribe out on special outings, etc. Our family hosts a 3 day backpack trip that has become a multi-family tradition now. So, yes at times I feel overwhelmed, and at other times, underwhelmed. I would not want to be the only place the kids hang out, but I enjoy the energy (mostly) when they are here. Since they can wander into anybodies house they want to, I kind of feel honored that they like our house so well and can be comfortable. Rob Sandelin South Snohomish County at the headwaters of Ricci Creek Sky Valley Environments <http://www.nonprofitpages.com/nica/SVE.htm> Field skills training for student naturalists Floriferous [at] msn.com -----Original Message----- From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org [mailto:cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org]On Behalf Of Shelly DeMeo Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 10:42 AM To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org Subject: Re: [C-L]_ overburdened "kool-aid" mom Hi-- After trying to get a group to agree on land for over four years, my husband and I are giving up on Hartford and signing on to join Rocky Hill Cohousing in Northampton, Mass. Groundbreaking will be in the fall. I am wondering what other parents have experienced in cohousing with the packs of children that tend to congregate and play together. Today, for example, I have eight children playing on my patio and in my yard. That is great for my children to have so many friends. What is not so great, is that my house is always full of these children whose parents seem to not check in or call for many hours at a time. I actually have to call each parent and "check in" and send the kids home. In addition to this, I do not allow my kids to watch very much television and limit electronics, so I end up "helping" them find something interesting to do. It takes up much time and energy. It would be helpful to hear how this scenario plays out in cohousing. My wish is that the kids all play OUTSIDE like in the commonhouse plaza area or woods with all of us parents sort of collectively policing and watching them. While my children have a little community of their own, what is lacking -- with my neighborhood of back yards fenced off from each other -- is collective parenting. I am hoping for a little more give and take... Is this a fantasy? -Shelly DeMeo Rocky Hill Cohousing Northampton, Mass. 16 sold out of 28 if anyone is interested ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sharon Villines" <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> To: <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 1:41 PM Subject: Re: [C-L]_Consensus requirements & Dealing with DifficultPeraonalities > > These two threads on Consensus requirements are interesting when you view > them together. > > On 4/21/2003 12:41 PM, "Juva DuBoise" <juva [at] comcast.net> wrote: > > > Before > > leaving consensus, I would suggest that the group attempt to discuss > > directly with this member the identified issue, (using Non-violent > > communication steps) giving her concrete examples of behaviors that are > > difficult for the community, what individuals (speaking for themselves) are > > feeling (emotions not thoughts), what they are hoping for - needing- and ask > > all along the way what she is hearing (supporting her by letting her know > > that this is hard and that the goal is to get her needs met).....If she is > > not at a point of being able to hear this...then reverse the process and see > > if someone can guess (this is a group process!) what she if feeling and > > needing. I understand how hard and risky this is.....but just imagine what > > group strength will come out of this! If you all are able to help her > > clarify what she is needing everyone wins. > > I would opt for this first. This will also lead to clarification of goals. > You can see where you agree and disagree. The group may need to split, and > offer each other support in building two different communities. > > If you can confront the feelings around this, you will be so far ahead of > where you are now. You will be amazed at the results for _everyone_. If you > just exclude this person, there will be another to take her place. Everyone, > including her, has to learn how to work with this situation. She is not the > problem -- the problem is working with diverse groups of individuals. You > have to work it out now or later, and as Laird Schaub says, "If you do it > later, the interest rates are very high." More comments below. > > > On 4/22/2003 12:31 PM, "Rob Sandelin" <floriferous [at] msn.com> wrote: > > > 1. People are willing to express what they think and feel without fear of > > reprisal. > > 2. Participants agree that the good of the group is the most important > > factor. > > 3. There at least one well trained facilitator to guide the group, or the > > entire group is well > > trained enough to guide itself. > > 4. The participants trust, or are willing to trust in the future, the group. > > 5. The participants can rely on the group to hold their personal interests > > fairly. > > 6. The process is evaluated regularly so participants learn and improve > > their skills > > 7. The participants are willing to invest the time it takes. > > Except for 7 and the need for common objectives, what Rob is giving as the > requirements for consensus I would call the _product_ of consensus. People > have to be willing to put in the time to consider everyone's feelings and > work them through to design a workable solution. The requirement of > consensus is the only thing I've seen that makes a group of people do the > hard work of reaching it. > > "The good of the group is the most important factor" I still disagree with > as we have discussed before. A strong group is composed of strong > individuals, otherwise you get group-think which is not in the best > interests of anyone. (A group of Anyones is not very interesting either.) > > Consensus requires that a solution be found that reasonably satisfies the > needs of all members of the group, not that all members of the group > "conform" or pretend to conform. This is why consensus well-done can produce > better and more long lasting decisions. > > Sharon > -- > Sharon Villines > Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC > http://www.takomavillage.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list > Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- RE: Individual vs. the group in consensus process, (continued)
- RE: Individual vs. the group in consensus process Rob Sandelin, April 24 2003
- Re: Individual vs. the group in consensus process Sharon Villines, April 25 2003
- Re: overburdened "kool-aid" mom Shelly DeMeo, April 25 2003
- Re: overburdened "kool-aid" mom Elizabeth Stevenson, April 25 2003
- RE: overburdened "kool-aid" mom Rob Sandelin, April 26 2003
- Re: Consensus requirements Tree Bressen, May 7 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.