RE: Board of directors setting boundaries | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sue Stigleman (tangosue![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:04:48 -0600 (MDT) |
Thank you so much for your email. I have saved several of your emails about decision making/consensus. They're very helpful. --sue > [Original Message] > From: Rob Sandelin <floriferous [at] msn.com> > To: <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> > Date: 7/26/2003 9:30:04 PM > Subject: RE: [C-L]_Board of directors setting boundaries > > > Your email title says it all. If you want boundaries to your > responsibilities then you need to set them and communicate them clearly and > consistently. This means, if you say, you don't want issues brought up > during the day which can wait for the board meeting, then all your board > members need to ask the question, why can't this wait until the board > meeting? If you are united and consistent then you will achieve setting > recognized boundaries which will be respected. > > So its up to you to figure out what the boundaries should be and implement > them. I have spent 5 years on the board of my community over a 13 year time > span and when on the board I was approachable about issues at any time, but > it was always very manageable, and I am good at delegating things to the > right people. After awhile, folks sort of figured out that I would delegate > their issue to someone and so they were able to find that person themselves > usually without my help. > > The board can be a big community responsibility and being available to help > troubleshoot is well within the boundaries we have set for our board, but > people here also seem to be pretty reasonable about when they bring stuff to > board members, and often dinner is a good venue for many types of issues. > > > Rob Sandelin > South Snohomish County at the headwaters of Ricci Creek > Sky Valley Environments <http://www.nonprofitpages.com/nica/SVE.htm> > Field skills training for student naturalists > Floriferous [at] msn.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org > [mailto:cohousing-l-admin [at] cohousing.org]On Behalf Of Fred H Olson > Sent: Friday, July 25, 2003 11:27 AM > To: -cohousing-L mailing list > Subject: [C-L]_Board of directors setting boundaries > > > > Sue Stigleman <tangosue [at] earthlink.net> > is the author of the message below. > It was posted by Fred the Cohousing-L list manager <fholson [at] > cohousing.org> > because the message included HTML ; PLEASE do not post HTML, see > http://csf.colorado.edu/cohousing/2001/msg01672.html and > http://www.harley.com/turn-off-html/ > -------------------- FORWARDED MESSAGE FOLLOWS -------------------- > > Hello. > > This is my first time posting. I moved into cohousing last September. I > am currently on the board of directors -- 5 people who are elected to > staggered terms. (and yes, the fact that I was asked to run for and was > elected to the board so quickly after moving in is indicative of some > problems with our community.) > > I am seeing a pattern that disturbs me, and I would like to get some input > from others as the board prepares to discuss this issue. > > ---Individual members ot the board are called at home and expected to > immediately step in and handle situations that arise over the course of > the day. > > ---Issues that fall within the pervue of our teams are being sent directly > to the board, rather than first to the relevant team, with a carbon copy > to the board so that the board is aware of the issue but not immediately > responsible for responding to it. What's the point of having teams at all > if everything goes straight to the board for action? > > As I think about this, I have realized that there seems to be an > underlying assumption that members of the board are also 24/7 on-site > property managers. > > If anyone else has experience or insight into this issue, I'd love to hear > from you. > > --sue > > Sue Stigleman > tangosue [at] earthlink.net > > _______________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list > Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 > > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.332 / Virus Database: 186 - Release Date: 3/6/02 > > _______________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list > Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: Board of directors setting boundaries, (continued)
- Re: Board of directors setting boundaries Cheryl Charis-Graves, July 25 2003
- RE: Board of directors setting boundaries Rob Sandelin, July 26 2003
- Re: Board of directors setting boundaries Joani Blank, July 28 2003
- Re: Board of directors setting boundaries Sue Stigleman, August 8 2003
- RE: Board of directors setting boundaries Sue Stigleman, August 8 2003
- Re: Board of directors setting boundaries Sue Stigleman, August 8 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.