Re: Board of directors setting boundaries | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sue Stigleman (tangosue![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 09:03:44 -0600 (MDT) |
Thank you so much for your email. It was very helpfpul. --sue > [Original Message] > From: Joani Blank <joani [at] swansway.com> > To: <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> > Date: 7/28/2003 5:57:10 AM > Subject: Re: [C-L]_Board of directors setting boundaries > > > In the two communities I've lived in (Doyle Street and Swan's Market--both > in the SF Bay Area), everyone is on the Board of the HOA so we don't have > the same problem you do. It seems to me that if a Board member gets a > request or demand that he or she feels should go to a committee or team > first, it should simply be forwarded to the appropriate team. > > For the property management issue, if the purview of the teams is well > delineated and posted or promoted, and there are issues that fall between > the cracks still, perhaps you need to look at your team structure to see > where a new team or new team expectation is in order. > > As far as the maintenance stuff that truly needs immediate attention, such > as backed up plumbing, it's a good idea to have someone with a title such > as "one-time project manager" preferably someone who works at home, to call > the plumber, electrician, etc. .....But I'm guessing you are not really > asking about that piece of it. > > Joani Blank > Oakland, CA > > > >Hello. > > > >This is my first time posting. I moved into cohousing last September. I > >am currently on the board of directors -- 5 people who are elected to > >staggered terms. (and yes, the fact that I was asked to run for and was > >elected to the board so quickly after moving in is indicative of some > >problems with our community.) > > > >I am seeing a pattern that disturbs me, and I would like to get some input > >from others as the board prepares to discuss this issue. > > > >---Individual members ot the board are called at home and expected to > >immediately step in and handle situations that arise over the course of > >the day. > > > >---Issues that fall within the pervue of our teams are being sent directly > >to the board, rather than first to the relevant team, with a carbon copy > >to the board so that the board is aware of the issue but not immediately > >responsible for responding to it. What's the point of having teams at all > >if everything goes straight to the board for action? > > > >As I think about this, I have realized that there seems to be an > >underlying assumption that members of the board are also 24/7 on-site > >property managers. > > > >If anyone else has experience or insight into this issue, I'd love to hear > >from you. > > > >--sue > > > >Sue Stigleman > >tangosue [at] earthlink.net > > Joani Blank > 510-834-7399 > Cell: 510-387-1315 > joani [at] swansway.com > www.joaniblank.com > > _______________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list > Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Board of directors setting boundaries Fred H Olson, July 25 2003
- Re: Board of directors setting boundaries Cheryl Charis-Graves, July 25 2003
- RE: Board of directors setting boundaries Rob Sandelin, July 26 2003
- Re: Board of directors setting boundaries Joani Blank, July 28 2003
- Re: Board of directors setting boundaries Sue Stigleman, August 8 2003
- RE: Board of directors setting boundaries Sue Stigleman, August 8 2003
- Re: Board of directors setting boundaries Sue Stigleman, August 8 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.