Problems with Voting | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Racheli Gai (racheli![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 08:14:12 -0600 (MDT) |
I agree with the point that voting doesn't *necessarily* entail ignoring those with differing views. However, it makes it very easy to do so. People who find it hard, even when using consensus, to listen and acknowledge the validity of opposing opinions, are much less likely to worry about that sort of thing when they have the numbers on their sides. I've worked with at least one organization which used Robert's rules. It seemed to me that the system allowed amazing level of manipulation by those "in the know". My impression is that it wasn't unique to that particular group. I "vote" for consensus ! :) R. -- ----------------------------------------------------------- racheli [at] sonoracohousing.com (Racheli Gai) ----------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- RE: Something faster and easier than consensus?, (continued)
- RE: Something faster and easier than consensus? Rob Sandelin, August 5 2003
-
RE: Something faster and easier than consensus? Fred H Olson, August 9 2003
-
Problems with Voting [was Something faster and easier than consensus?] Sharon Villines, August 9 2003
- Re: Problems with Voting [was Something faster and easier than consensus?] Joani Blank, August 9 2003
- Problems with Voting Racheli Gai, August 10 2003
- RE: Problems with Voting Rob Sandelin, August 27 2003
- RE: Problems with Voting [was Something faster and easier than consensus?] Rob Sandelin, August 27 2003
-
Problems with Voting [was Something faster and easier than consensus?] Sharon Villines, August 9 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.