Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Randa Johnson (Saranda![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 11:45:08 -0600 (MDT) |
Keeping things "equal" in money matters is impossible when in this society your race, sex, and your parents' economic status have a lot more to do with your earning power than how hard your work. I would say that "poor" is a state of mind, more than a state of income. I have found that there are plenty of people who have a large amount of money who see themselves as "poor." There is too poor to pay the utility bill, and too poor to buy a new car, a new house, or to go out to eat twice a week. People with low incomes donate a higher percentage of money to charity than people with high incomes. Given the opportunity, most Americans will opt to pay the lower end of a sliding scale, because most of us seem to believe that we do not have enough, no matter how much we have. I think my personal comfort about individual sponsorship of particular projects on a community's wish list would depend on the people involved, and whether a big focus was centered on people who could not contribute at a certain time, as well as those who contributed extra at a particular time. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property?, (continued)
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? Kay Argyle, September 26 2003
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of community property? Elizabeth Stevenson, September 27 2003
- Re: Should individual "sponsorship" be allowed of communityproperty? Jim Snyder-Grant, October 1 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.