Re: Silencing the uncomfortable truth | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Elizabeth Stevenson (tamgoddess![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 11:09:06 -0600 (MDT) |
I know, Racheli, I know. You are right of course, and more grown-up than I. But I can't imagine that I will ever silence certain people. I can, however, be certain that others have been silenced, because they write to me and tell me so. I do take your point, and normally agree with you. But nobody has said they disagree with me *because* I've been so strident. I guess at this point, what I'm trying to say is that I can't change the minds of those whose are made up, but to let people know that silence doesn't mean everyone agrees. In that way, it's different from other worldly conflicts. If I were negotiating for peace, I wouldn't use the same methods at all. I think this list could use a little less peace. Yes, I'm in the minority. But does that mean I'm wrong? Isn't there a time to protest? Sorry-this won't be another long post! Liz > From: racheli [at] sonoracohousing.com (Racheli Gai) > > Hi Liz, > I think that something that you might not perceive is that your way of > expressing yourself, at those times when you "let loose" silences some > people, too. > I read in your post the implicit idea that if we are not ready to be > offensive (or at least quite aggressive), we can't possibly care about > social justice. Well, I DO care, and I don't only "care" - I work for > it. > For me, HOW I work for something is just as important as what it is that I > work for: In order to make a connection with people, one needs to discuss > things in ways which > hopefully allows them to hear. If I come across as judgmental, it helps > people on the "other side" feel defensive and shut down, so that no > dialogue can take place. In which case, whatever one says doesn't really > count, does it? I think that the less judgmental attitudes we bring with > us, the more we are able to understand where other people are coming from. > We might still disagree, > perhaps even PASSIONATELY disagree about important things, but if we made > some kind of a connection (and if we allow for the possibility that we, > too, might be wrong, or might have something to learn even from those we > disagree with) - then perhaps the other side might also hear us? > > Coming from the Middle East, I know that it's easy to demonize the other > side, and that this will NEVER bring about peace OR Justice. I don't think > this is unique to the Middle East :) > > All the above isn't to say that what you expressed doesn't contain some > important truths (IMO), it's to say that I think that you sometimes go > about getting people to see it in the wrong way. > > It's email, where controlling "tone" is difficult, and I might come across > as preachy, which isn't my intent. I'm just trying to convey something > which is very important to me, and I'm not sure how to do it without > sounding like I'm on the soap-box... > > R. _______________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list Cohousing-L [at] cohousing.org Unsubscribe and other info: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L
-
Silencing the uncomfortable truth-long Elizabeth Stevenson, October 2 2003
-
Silencing the uncomfortable truth-long Racheli Gai, October 2 2003
- Re: Silencing the uncomfortable truth Elizabeth Stevenson, October 2 2003
- The difference between "quiet" and "peace" Racheli Gai, October 2 2003
-
Silencing the uncomfortable truth-long Racheli Gai, October 2 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.