Re: Values in community, was sexuality | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Craig Ragland (craigraglandgmail.com) | |
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:58:19 -0800 (PST) |
ASK, then ask someone else, and then someone else. Its been interesting for me to experience my reactions to this thread. I find myself uncomfortable with the idea of getting as specific as others have been. I'm just not comfortable making pronouncements about Songaian's sexuality or politics, etc. I guess its a boundary issue... I don't feel that I have permission to publically share stuff that might be private to others... especially with 600 ('of my closest friends"). And, talking about this in the abstract doesn't feel authentic for me. On 3/14/06, Cher Stuewe Portnoff <cher710 [at] mchsi.com> wrote: > > Ditto. This is something we'd want to know before joining a community, but > as guest/visitors, how/who would we ask? I guess Emily's email encourages > us > to just do it -- good practice for living in community, too. >
-
Re: Values in community, was sexuality Emily Pitt, March 14 2006
-
Re: Values in community, was sexuality Cher Stuewe Portnoff, March 14 2006
- Re: Values in community, was sexuality Craig Ragland, March 14 2006
- Re: Values in community, was sexuality Sharon Villines, March 15 2006
- Re: Values in community, was sexuality ken, March 16 2006
- Re: Values in community, was sexuality Sharon Villines, March 16 2006
- Re: Values in community, was sexuality Anna i Bartłomiej Jurkiewicz, March 16 2006
-
Re: Values in community, was sexuality Cher Stuewe Portnoff, March 14 2006
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.