Re: Affordability? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Deborah Mensch (deborahmenschgmail.com) | |
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 13:47:13 -0700 (PDT) |
Catya's reply below reminds me that there are more ways to achieve human-scale community than new-built cohousing. I've been reading the book, Superbia!, by Dan Chiras and Dave Wann (the latter a member of Harmony Village Cohousing in Golden, CO). They outline 31 steps that a suburban community can take to become a closer-knit community a la cohousing, changing first the relationships among the people (potlucks and common meals, tool and skill exchanges, babysitting coops, etc.) and later the landscape (taking down backyard fences, creating community gardens and orchards, traffic-calming in the street or even eliminating it, buying or building a house to use as a common house, and more). Many of the same steps can be done in an apartment building or other urban environment. In their example, doing the whole shebang might take 6 or 7 years, but hey, some cohousing communities take that long from inception to move-in. And what the steps essentially do is give a regular neighborhood the same kind of perks as cohousing, but gradually, with less capital outlay, and with the people already in your neighborhood (and those who move in with natural turnover). The Superbia! approach can offer a cost savings compared to new-built cohousing, assuming people can afford to live where they currently do, because many of the changes advocated in Superbia! are free. Some cost money up front, like some kinds of remodeling, but since people are working on their own houses and the work can take place over time, sweat equity (and mutual aid between neighbors with complementary skills) can play a big part. And most of the changes, whether free or not, end up saving money over the long haul, whether in utility bills (energy-efficiency retrofits and additional trees), doctor bills (by creating a walkable community and encouraging exercise and beneficial social supports), or entertainment expenses (by creating more "there" there in the suburbs). I'd recommend the book as an inspiring text for anyone interested in creating more community among humans and more livable neighborhoods. And it may have particular application to the question of affordable community. -Deborah Mensch Pleasant Hill Cohousing, Pleasant Hill, CA (my current community) Tumblerock, Boulder area, CO (my forming community, where we're having our first public event March 24 at Nomad Cohousing in Boulder, 3:30-5:30 p.m. -- contact me for more info at deborah [at] tumblerock.org or by replying to this message) On 3/15/07, Catya Belfer-Shevett <catya [at] homeport.org> wrote:
> Are there any cohousing communities that are really affordable? Not cohousing communities that have some sort of small "affordable" subsidized housing, but genuinely created by those of us that are middle income? I have followed a number of cohousing-L member links back to their websites and have become increasingly worried about the costliness of these ventures. I have found some units for sale that approach $700,000. My group consists of several families - a half million dollar home is completely out of the question, as is $200,000 for an undeveloped lot. And, honestly, I just don't get it. Shouldn't scale help here? Am I being naïve? In addition to what others have said... There's not a lot of new construction that's affordable. Mainstream folks with less in the way of income will often rent a place. Intentional Community folks with less in the way of income have a bunch of non-cohousing options (sharing a large house being perhaps the most common?) Even where I live (outside of Boston), one can find an older or more run down house to rent or to buy for less money than what new construction costs. There's not any equivalently older or more rundown cohousing. "How to make new construction affordable" is a hard question. - catya ____ Catya Belfer-Shevett ____\ / Cohousing in MA? catya [at] cohousing.org \ / \/ www.mosaic-commons.org www.catya.org \/ Ready Fall 2008!
- Re: Play or Pay (was Consensus), (continued)
- Re: Play or Pay (was Consensus) Kathleen Heft Nolan, March 17 2007
- Re: Affordability? Sharon Villines, March 17 2007
- Re: Affordability? Brian Bartholomew, March 17 2007
- Re: Affordability? Deborah Mensch, March 15 2007
- Re: Affordability w/small homes? VAN DEIST, March 17 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.