Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Brian Bartholomew (bbstat.ufl.edu) | |
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 13:36:38 -0700 (PDT) |
I'm trying to figure out if the intentional neighborhood we're trying to build should be labeled a cohousing. In the view of the cohousing movement, is a "common" facility identified as such because it has shared *ownership*, or shared *use*? Is collective ownership of property so central to cohousing that a group isn't cohousing without it? I'm reading through "The six defining characteristics of cohousing". For #3 we plan to share the use of meeting halls, workshops, gardens, and woods, but we don't plan to share the ownership of them. For #4 there are no policies for the community, because the authority is not delegated to anyone to make them. However, we can still act alike if we want to. For #5 no one person (or persons) has authority over others, because there is no shared ownership of real property, HOA, or other authorization of such authority. Group decisions are made by consensus, and it's the real thing because there is no majority vote or other trump hidden anywhere in the process. Brian
-
Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? Brian Bartholomew, June 22 2007
- Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? Sharon Villines, June 22 2007
-
Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? Michael Barrett, June 22 2007
-
Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? Brian Bartholomew, June 22 2007
- Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? Michael Barrett, June 22 2007
-
Re: Is communal ownership obligatory for cohousing? Brian Bartholomew, June 22 2007
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.