Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Monty Berman (mberman116hotmail.com) | |
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:48:10 -0800 (PST) |
Perhaps we could have posted at the top of every Digest the earlier-delivered mentioning of the practice of deleting not fully necessary "tails" in our automatic replies to messages (be it on this listserv or any of our personal messages). Regards, Monty Berman EcoVillage at Ithaca, NY (And I almost forgot to do this on this one )> From: cohousing-l-request [at] cohousing.org> Subject: Cohousing-L Digest, Vol 48, Issue 23> To: cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:16:07 -0800> > Send Cohousing-L mailing list submissions to> cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> >
-
Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" Monty Berman, January 16 2008
-
Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" James Kacki, January 16 2008
- Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" Sharon Villines, January 16 2008
- Fwd: Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" Marcia J. Bates, January 16 2008
- Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" Rebecca Reid, January 16 2008
-
Re: to "tail" or not to "tail" James Kacki, January 16 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.