Re: Variations on low cost housing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ana Sweet (sweetana3![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 15:45:05 -0700 (PDT) |
Brian mentioned capsule units and such and then brought up the story of the woman living in her car "with her two golden retrievers". I do not believe that the story discussed the issue of pets and the burden it places on finding housing of any kind. Two large dogs would prevent her from renting almost any subsidized housing in my city and most of the apartment complexes. It is a pretty unusual unit that allows pets, especially multiple pets of size. Extremely small units (capsules) even more so would probably restrict pets of almost any kind due to noise, potential smells, potential for fleas, etc. There are a great many people who would choose their car over their pets who have the money to secure housing for themselves (and a great number who dispose of their pets). We recognize that our 5 cats means we have to be homeowners and I would not choose any housing type that had restrictions on our pets. However, I understand the housing issues they cause. Ana potential cohousing member
- Re: Variations on low cost housing, (continued)
- Re: Variations on low cost housing Sharon Villines, May 22 2008
- Re: Variations on low cost housing Tim Mensch, May 22 2008
- Re: Variations on low cost housing Marganne, May 23 2008
- Re: Variations on low cost housing John Beutler, May 23 2008
- Re: Variations on low cost housing Ana Sweet, May 23 2008
- Re: Variations on low cost housing Robert Heinich, May 28 2008
- Re: Variations on low cost housing Marganne, May 21 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.