|Re: Mini-cohousing||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Rachel (rlederman2momslaw.com)|
|Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:28:39 -0700 (PDT)|
we're thinking of doing something similar with our house here in San Francisco. In terms of the group ownership, we've owned a 2 unit house for many years as tenants in common and there are many slightly larger (3 -6 unit) houses in our neighborhood that are also TICs. We haven't had any problems getting financing as a TIC group and you would have a contract that defines your various rights and obligations. The problem is what happens when someone wants to sell their share. the entire group is probably forced to refinance in order for the new buyers to obtain financing. this is one reason most cohousing developments are condos. different municipalities have different restrictions on condo conversion of existing housing though.
On Jul 25, 2009, at 7:22 AM, Alex Kent wrote:
Does anyone have experience with mini-cohousing? The idea here is to put together a group of, say, 3 families (with orwithout children), purchase either a larger house and subdivide it into individual units and common areas (e.g., kitchen, living room, workshop, etc.), OR buy a small multifamily house and create common spaces within it while preserving the discrete nature of the original individual apartments.The goals of this arrangement would be to create a small community orextended family and to reduce the often crushing economic burden associatedwith home ownership.Obviously, the most challenging aspect of this scheme would to put together the right mix of people, what my friend Lou calls "grown-ups." In a larger cohousing community, not everyone has to be friends with everyone else as long as people can remain civil to one another. But if everyone lives underthe same roof, bonds have to be tighter and the willingness to balanceindividual imperatives against the needs of the group has to be more highlydeveloped. People would really have to like each other.Then there are the financial and contractual aspects of co-ownership of a single piece of real estate. How would a lender look at group ownership ofreal estate?From what I can tell, the problem with what has rapidly become the norm forcohousing in the US is that it is a movement for the upper middle class.Cohousing is not cheap. It may be a more attractive and "sustainable"approach to development and housing, but it still takes a lot of money, especially for people like me. I am certainly not poor, but neither am I wealthy enough to be able to afford a house in many of the established or forming cohousing communities with much ease. And I am simply weary ofbeing a slave to a mortgage and other dwelling-related expenses. Moreover, I like living where I live now, a college town in WesternMassachusetts, a place rich in cultural, educational, and natural resources. I would be loathe to leave this area, but once again, these things do notcome cheaply. Co-ownership seems like a good way to defray the costs. Thoughts? Anyone interested in continuing the conversation off-line? Alex Kent 83 North Prospect Street Amherst, MA 01002 USA 413-896-7641 www.japantrans.com _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/
- Mini-cohousing Alex Kent, July 25 2009
- Re: Mini-cohousing Catya Belfer-Shevett, July 27 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.