Re: The whole picture (was disengagement) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah (welcomeolympus.net) | |
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:57:11 -0800 (PST) |
In response to Jessie, who has health and family matters taking center
focus for now.
I don't think any community expects participation "no matter what". We
all go through periods of greater and lesser availability due to
health, family, work, relationship, and other variables. I think the
sort of disengagement folks are referring to is of a more permanent
sort, not due to energy needed elsewhere, but due to no longer feeling
connected to the community. The support you refer to from your
community as you focus on health issues IS a connection. The care and
support we offer each other are an expression of community.
In response to Karen, no doubt about it, unconditional love is a beautiful thing, and a fine goal. At the same time, there are folks I'd rather love from a distance, rather than have them calling the police on their neighbors, phoning people at 6am and 1130 pm because their cat is in sight, issuing directives and demands vs true requests or suggestions, and generally behaving as if their way is the only acceptable way of doing things. This simply does not work well in a community of 24 households!
Lynn Nadeau RoseWind Cohousing Port Townsend WA where I turned my heat on for the first time this year, yesterday
-
The whole picture (was disengagement) Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah, November 4 2009
-
The whole picture (was disengagement) Karen Kudia, November 4 2009
- Re: The whole picture (was disengagement) Jessie Kome, November 4 2009
- Re: The whole picture (was disengagement) Fred H Olson, November 5 2009
- Re: The whole picture (was disengagement) Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah, November 5 2009
- The whole picture (was disengagement) Karen Kudia, November 6 2009
-
The whole picture (was disengagement) Karen Kudia, November 4 2009
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.