Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: PattyMara Gourley (pmgourley![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 16:01:39 -0700 (PDT) |
Karen wrote: *I bet many of us are loathe to build in consequences at the time of an agreement is adopted unless things start to fall apart.* An 'honor system' requires that all the players be honorable. I believe it is a better idea to build in consequences at the time an agreement is adopted, because when things start to fall apart, it's already too late,,,,the damage has been done. Do the heavy lifting early on. Consequences may or may not prove to be preventative. But at least they will be in place, if needed. Then, all ll that is required is the will to enforce them. Easier said than done, but still a good idea. PattyMara -- *Aa' menealle nauva calen ar' malta*. (May your ways be green and golden.) http://www.pattymara.weebly.com http://www.facebook.com/pattymara <http://www.pattymara.weebly.com> **
- Re: dogs in community, (continued)
-
Re: dogs in community David Bygott, June 24 2011
-
Re: dogs in community Karen Carlson, June 25 2011
- Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] Sharon Villines, June 25 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] Karen Carlson, June 25 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] PattyMara Gourley, June 25 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] Joanie Connors, June 25 2011
-
Re: dogs in community Karen Carlson, June 25 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] John Carver, June 25 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] Sharon Villines, June 27 2011
-
Re: dogs in community David Bygott, June 24 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] Norman Gauss, June 26 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.