| Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: John Carver (jcarver islandnet.com)
|
|
| Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:21:19 -0700 (PDT) | |
On 25/06/2011 11:53 AM, Sharon Villines wrote:
A good question was raised in the Dynamic Governance workshop at Coho University at the Coho Conference. Is a proposal clearly defined if it doesn't include "teeth". Is it a proposal at all? Or is it meaningless?
Conversely, if it needs enforcement to function, do you really have an agreement?
John Carver Pacific Gardens Cohousing Nanaimo, BC
- Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community], (continued)
- Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] Sharon Villines, June 25 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] Karen Carlson, June 25 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] PattyMara Gourley, June 25 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] Joanie Connors, June 25 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] John Carver, June 25 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] Sharon Villines, June 27 2011
- Re: Teeth in Rules [Was dogs in community] Norman Gauss, June 26 2011
- Re: dogs in community Wayne Tyson, June 26 2011
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.