Re: Affordable Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jenny Guy (jenstermeistergmail.com) | |
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:58:32 -0800 (PST) |
Kingfisher Cohousing in Oakland, California is following New Brighton's example. We've just purchased a 9 unit apartment complex, with room for a common house (eventually). It's two buildings, with front doors facing a central courtyard. One apartment is vacant and one of our members is moving in immediately. For the rest, we'll be waiting for vacancies, but we're happily situated in nearby homes, so we aren't worried about the wait. It's a very solid property, built in 1940, but with deferred maintenance and old wiring and plumbing. So we will have work to do, but it's habitable now and very charming, and has strong bones. It's much, much cheaper for us than new construction. We have all had to put in a big down payment, so our model wouldn't work for people who didn't have that, unless the community had more members at the time of purchase. This is working for some of us with a chunk of money from an inheritance or selling a house, but very low income (way below what qualifies you for affordable housing around here). Jenny Guy Kingfisher Cohousing on Brookdale Ave. Oakland, CA On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:03 AM, R.N. Johnson <cohoranda [at] yahoo.com> wrote: > > We ended up buying a commercial property with 12 units for well below > market rate. > Randa Johnson > New Brighton Cohousing > Aptos, CA >
- Architecture Re: Affordable Cohousing, (continued)
- Architecture Re: Affordable Cohousing Wayne Tyson, December 31 2012
- Re: Architecture Re: Affordable Cohousing rpdowds, January 1 2013
- Re: Architecture Re: Affordable Cohousing Wayne Tyson, January 1 2013
- Re: Architecture Re: Affordable Cohousing nancybtoo, January 1 2013
- Re: Affordable Cohousing oz, January 2 2013
- Re: Affordable Cohousing Kerry Strayton, September 12 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.