Re: Covenants guidelines | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah (welcome![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 09:28:31 -0700 (PDT) |
RoseWind Cohousing, Port Townsend WA, 25 years in. I second the advice to think carefully about your documents. It's so complicated, it's tempting to just plug in a bunch of legal boilerplate, to satisfy authorities. But the time will come when it is the pivotal bottom line, as you may deal with a cranky estate, senile member, difficulty achieving a quorum, someone who claims to have a "dispute" with the Association. Maybe it doesn't seem to matter now -- when the people are known and trusted -- to have a policy about cutting down trees on the commons, unattended campfires, weapons, pets, pesticides, and all that. Look too at what it will take to change your documents. Are there some things you want to make very difficult to do (like dissolving the Association; going to a vote)? Things you want more flexibility about, as they might be more likely to evolve? This can be reflected in where you put things. "CC&Rs" might take a different quorum/notification requirement to change. We have CC&Rs, Bylaws, and "Regulations". The latter are comprised of any duly-adopted policies. These are less set in stone, as we can easily agree to change them. We also define various types of decisions. Class One are things like budget, expenses (over $1000) outside of the annual budget , major policy changes. These require a quorum and ten day notice. Other decisions can be decided without a quorum or notification: yes, Susie can plant an apple tree on the commons by her house, let's take $300 from our unallocated funds and build a roof over the cob bread oven. Find some examples from the state you live in, for the legal form you choose (coop, condo, nonprofit, LLC). I found a set for a gated community near here that, while very different from our less controlling attitude, was useful as a checklist. No, we don't want to control what plants people have on their porches, but what's this legalese here? Is it something we should include? They had obviously spent a lot of money of lawyers, and had thought of everything there was to regulate, so it was a good thing to consult, along with documents from many other sorts of communities. We did our own work, and, on a limited budget, only had a lawyer check it over when we had done all we could ourselves. And about every seven years we've needed to do a thoughtful overhaul to remove obsolete references, clarify items, add things that have come up. Maraiah Lynn Nadeau www.rosewind.org Full tilt spring, new crops of spinach, beets, etc coming up, lettuce in the greenhouse, planting flowers around the edge of the garden fence
-
Covenants Guidelines Shari Hirst, April 7 2014
- Re: Covenants guidelines Lynn Nadeau / Maraiah, April 9 2014
-
Re: Covenants guidelines drmaryann49, April 10 2014
- Re: Covenants guidelines Ann Zabaldo, April 10 2014
- Re: Covenants guidelines drmaryann49, April 19 2014
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.