Re: Sharing Economy/Truly Capitalist | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Beverly Jones Redekop (beverly.jones.redekop![]() |
|
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:45:18 -0700 (PDT) |
We call it the quad...and it adds another level of complication to the already intentional complexity of cohousing. I love the people in the quad, and I am happy to have each of them as neighbours, but I don't think it was a very good idea to build it. The rent for the four suites in this one "quad" unit is the same or more than rent would be for two 2-bedroom units, so there is no affordability advantage. I don't think they like sharing a kitchen with so many people, as many of them are adding kitchenette-type appliances to their private sitting areas. It has been occupied since 2010, but the private backyard is still in construction condition with no landscaping -- I think it’s harder for residents to define their sense of personal stewardship in this ambiguous space. It is just terribly rigid: our other homes can work interchangeably for singles, couples, or families, but the quad is trickier. It would be better to have two flexible 2-bedroom units that are tweaked a bit to be better for equal roommates: equal-sized bedrooms, perhaps with separate bathrooms, and maybe two distinct pantries and coat closets. Perhaps the living room could have old-fashioned pocket doors to allow it to be two separate sitting areas as needed. The two units could be situated beside each other to make a bit of a quad, but they would retain the flexibility of being able to hold other household types. For the same rent that they pay in the quad, they could have 2:1 kitchen ratios instead of a 4:1 kitchen ratio. That being said, if someone out there is considering this model, I could introduce you to residents who may see it more positively than I do. Beverly www.groundswellcohousing.ca Yarrow, BC On Wed, Oct 21, 2015, 11:15 AM Kathryn McCamant < kmccamant [at] cohousing-solutions.com> wrote: > > Yarrow EcoVillage, in British Columbia, has a shared house with four > suites (large bedroom and private bathroom), and shared kitchen living > area. I hear it is working well and allows (mostly single) people of > various ages to rent in the community. The key is having a couple > community investors who are willing to own this unit. I think in the > current conservative lending environment, it would be very challenging to > get loans for the “shares” of a unit like this. In theory, it could be > owned as “tenants in common” but those tend to be messy when people want > to sell their share. Perhaps better to keep it a rental for long term > flexibility and to diversify who can participate in cohousing. From the > plannng department point of view, it is reall just a large home with one > kitchen. From a community point of view, you should probably plan for > their being one car per resident in a shared home, unless you live in a > truly urban environment where people really live car-free. > > > Katie > -- > Kathryn McCamant, President > Nevada City Cohousing and > CoHousing Solutions > 241B Commercial Street > Nevada City, CA 95959 > T.530.478.1970 C.916.798.4755 > www.cohousing-solutions.com > > > > > > > > On 10/21/15, 10:55 AM, "Cohousing-L on behalf of Emilie Parker" > <cohousing-l-bounces+kmccamant=cohousing-solutions.com [at] cohousing.org on > behalf of emilie.v.parker [at] gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Sharon Villines > ><sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> > >wrote: > > > >> As we have discussed before, if we want to have 20-somethings living in > >> cohousing, we need to have rental units. And/or shared living > >>arrangements > >> where young singles can have a private room and bathroom and share other > >> facilities. > > > > > >If you could get approval for a shared house in cohousing which is not > >the > >case in Boulder County right now, would you design it with a shared > >kitchen > >in addition to the common house kitchen? Do any cohousing communities > >have > >the shared living arrangements you describe? > > > > > >----------------- > >Emilie Parker > >emilie.v.parker [at] gmail.com > >303-317-4558 main > >240-350-8533 cell > >My website: www.emilieparker.com > >Artists Cohousing website: www.artistscohousing.com > >Art Cohousing Meetup: www.meetup.com/artists-housing-community > >_________________________________________________________________ > >Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > >http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > >
- Re: Sharing Economy/Truly Capitalist, (continued)
- Re: Sharing Economy/Truly Capitalist Sharon Villines, October 21 2015
-
Re: Sharing Economy/Truly Capitalist Sharon Villines, October 21 2015
- Re: Sharing Economy/Truly Capitalist Emilie Parker, October 21 2015
- Re: Sharing Economy/Truly Capitalist Kathryn McCamant, October 21 2015
- Re: Sharing Economy/Truly Capitalist Beverly Jones Redekop, October 21 2015
- Re: Sharing Economy/Truly Capitalist Sharon Villines, October 22 2015
- Re: Sharing Economy/Truly Capitalist R Philip Dowds, October 22 2015
- Re: Sharing Economy/Truly Capitalist Catya Belfer, October 22 2015
- Re: Sharing Economy/Truly Capitalist Sharon Villines, October 21 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.