Cohousing vs Nextdoor | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: William New (wnew![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:16:19 -0800 (PST) |
> On Jan 5, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Diana Carroll <dianaecarroll [at] gmail.com> > wrote: > > what is their business model? How do they make money? > Because if they are for-profit, they have to make money *somehow*. The same can be said for co-housing, non-profit enterprises, schools, academic research, and every other on-going economic activity that needs to pay their bills (including interest on debt or comparable return to at-risk equity contributors) in order to sustainably survive: one needs to “make” money somehow, either by receiving grants, charging tuition, collecting contributions, or — yes — selling a product/service to a customer who believes that what they receive is more valuable than the money they have in their pocket, so for the seller there is something (“profit”) left over to invest back in this business or into another. In the non-profit world we call the “something left over” by the name “retained surplus”. All of these organizations can be fully truthful and well run (and most are), and any of these could be sneaky or abusive. For-profits are no more guilty of exploitation than the others, with egregious examples in every category. Full disclosure is the key to making a buyer/customer decision as to whether one should participate. Caveat emptor is an eternal verity, regardless of the business model, be it for-profit, non-profit, academia or any other enterprise that exchanges goods/services for money. Amen. === Bill (thoughts after 60+ years personal involvement in all of these economic structures) William New StillCreek Commons 94062-0951
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.