Re: Funding and Organizational Model for Coho US | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ken Winter (ken![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:56:58 -0700 (PDT) |
>From a community member's view, a *community portal* is a single web site where the member can sign in and get access to *all *of the community's digital information services - look up member info, catch up on community news, sign up for meals, check and update calendars of community events and meetings, look up the community's decisions and agreements, reserve a room or other resource, offer or request to share an object or a service, set up and track work assignments, participate in forum conversations, pay community bills and check your balances, etc etc etc - *and* participate in Coho US and the whole world of cohousing, including the things that Sharon describes here, and who knows what more. On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 2:54 PM, Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> wrote: > > To my knowledge the funding and organizational model for Coho US is a > community membership model. I think it is because it based on a > fundamentally flawed assumption — that cohousing communities have a > commitment to the cohousing movement. > > Most members of my community have no knowledge of the national cohousing > organization or any interest in a movement. It isn’t a cause. I was shocked > when I joined this group that people were not expected to read at least one > of the books on cohousing. Some if not many had no knowledge of other > cohousing communities. They saw the flyer on a bulletin board somewhere, > thought it sounded like something interesting, and it matched their > political and social ideals. They moved in because they wanted to live > here, not to join a movement. They have their own movements. > > And we have the #1 cohousing advocate and activist Ann Zabaldo living in > our midst. We are a member of the national organization primarily because > she advocates it. And once a budget item is in the budget, it tends to stay. > > So a membership organization supported by communities is probably not the > model that will ever work. More communities will probably not provide the > level of support the movement needs. > > I think Coho US needs to move to an individual membership model. I’m > fairly certain, for example, that individuals in my community would give > more as individuals than the amount our community will budget. Individual > memberships might also create competition — How many of your community > members support Coho US? > > Under Alice’s leadership, Catya’s work on the website (which is content > and capability, not just technical), and the new research effort, there are > many more features in place to demonstrate that the organization is > contributing to a housing revolution. The development of cohousing has > changed all forms of housing by influencing the ideas of developers and > urban planners. A good newsletter that records and publicizes those > accomplishments would bring in donations from individuals and > organizations. Factual articles and blurbs — not cheerleading or sales > pitches. For one reason or another, there are many people who have a strong > feelings of support, not just people living in cohousing. There is no > organized way for non-cohousers to connect and contribute. > > Develop a balanced focus on old as well as new communities. Cohousing > communities need help forming and help remaining fiscally and socially > strong in 20 years, and 30 years. Approaches for redesigning common houses. > Best furniture replacement ideas. > > Use the various platforms like Kickstarter to fund special projects — the > database of photos of CH interiors, for example. A file of kitchens, > laundry rooms, kids rooms, etc. One such picture I received was of a > combined laundry room and active play room. Something I had never thought > of. The pingpong table doubled as a folding table. The machines were along > a wall instead of a separate room. In another community the machines are > spread out through the community, not all in one place. Those are vitally > helpful to old communities as well as new. The FIC was very successful in > getting funding for a “real” office this way. > > This is also a good way to show support to foundations. "We have 2,000 > members", or 5,000 members. Not 50 member communities (or whatever the > number is). With a few more than 100 communities, the numbers by community > will never be impressive. > > There is an enormous amount of information online to inform a move in this > direction. And an enormous amount in the cohousing communities. Hiring > expensive consultants is not always necessary. Through word of mouth build > a database of the skills of cohousers and approach them individually to > help with projects. Don’t ask for volunteers — people may volunteer who > don’t have the skills and those who do may not step forward. Experienced > people have other things to do and may never even hear that the association > is even open to help. Define aims and write job descriptions, and ask > people to sign on. Ask professionals to help write the job descriptions. > People will donate different kinds of help and this is a valuable one. > > There have to be tons of grants out there for projects. A key piece of > advice I’ve gotten from successful grant writers is not to wait for RFPs. > Or read the requirements for a grant program and write something. The place > to start is with a foundation that is interested in some subject area that > would benefit cohousing and talk to them. Develop a relationship.d Find out > what they want to fund. What are they looking for? I know a writer who did > the same thing with magazine editors. He stopped submitting articles he > thought they would like and instead chatted them up to see what they hoped > for. > > Grant writers may work for a % of grants received. And they pay for > themselves. The subject of cooperative, self-supported, group housing has > been a social problem for generations. Eons, actually. Organizations take > 10-15% of these grants for handling the paperwork and providing the 501c3 > sponsorship. (10-15% may be old information but you get the idea.) > > I’m sending this to everyone instead of just to Alice because I think we > need discussion on this and this is the place cohousers discuss and share > experiences. > > Sharon > ---- > Sharon Villines > Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC > http://www.takomavillage.org > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://www.cohousing.org/cohousing-L/ > > >
- Re: Funding and Organizational Model for Coho US, (continued)
- Re: Funding and Organizational Model for Coho US Jerry McIntire, June 17 2015
- Re: Funding and Organizational Model for Coho US Catya Belfer, June 17 2015
- Re: Funding and Organizational Model for Coho US Sharon Villines, June 17 2015
- Re: Funding and Organizational Model for Coho US Sharon Villines, March 21 2016
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.