Re: The popularization of the term Co-housing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: R Philip Dowds (rpdowdscomcast.net) | |
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 05:13:51 -0700 (PDT) |
Condos, HOAs and co-ops all exist at the pleasure of State enabling legislation, and the definitions and rules for each vary from State to State. For our purposes, however, a key distinction is how much, or how little, is owned in common: — Condos often share much in common, especially if they are urban and look like an apartment building. Commonalities may include roof, walls, and other parts of the weather envelope; mechanical and electrical systems (like central heat and air conditioning); corridors, stairs, and elevators; underground parking; and so on. The entire outdoors is usually a single lot owned by the association. Since so much of the property value is owned, maintained and insured in common, annual condo fees tend to be HIGH. — HOAs, in contrast, own little in common, and often look like single family, duplex or row house homes in a suburban or rural setting. Commonalities might be limited a shared private road, a swimming pool, and a clubhouse. Much of the outdoors may be partitioned by imaginary lines defining private yards appended to different dwelling units. Because so little is owned in common, annual HOA fees tend to be relatively LOW. But each dwelling unit must pay its own separate costs for heat, electricity, insurance, painting and the like. Lots of compromises between these two extremes are possible, and successful cohousing can be found in any of the models. Best I know, however, there is very little State law that formally acknowledges cohousing as a use type or ownership type. State law is about unit owners, landlords, tenants, and property rights; the States know little or nothing about “intentional communities”, “members", "consensus”, or other attributes distinctive to cohousing. So cohousing functions in the interstices of the real estate ecosystem. Thanks, Philip Dowds Cornerstone Village Cohousing Cambridge, MA > On Oct 23, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Beverly Jones Redekop <beverly.jones.redekop > [at] gmail.com> wrote: > > Our ecovillage "umbrella" includes cohousing for the residential piece, > organic farmland, a riparian restoration zone, and a future commercial zone. > > "The overwhelming number of cohousing communities are HOA Condos or Co-ops." > How do other stratas (Canadian term that I believe is equivalent to > American HOA) include the fact of cohousing in your legally-filed strata / > HOA documents? We need to follow state/provincial regulations, but these > legal papers shouldn't mislead purchasers into thinking that it's a regular > strata. > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016, 8:37 AM Ann Zabaldo <zabaldo [at] earthlink.net> wrote: > >> >> Hello Ty — >> >> My guess is this topic will get a lot of mileage on this list. I’m just >> going to address a couple of things: >> >> ... >>
- Re: The popularization of the term Co-housing, (continued)
-
Re: The popularization of the term Co-housing Ann Zabaldo, October 22 2016
- Re: The popularization of the term Co-housing Beverly Jones Redekop, October 23 2016
- Re: The popularization of the term Co-housing Ann Zabaldo, October 24 2016
- Re: The popularization of the term Co-housing Beverly Jones Redekop, October 24 2016
- Re: The popularization of the term Co-housing R Philip Dowds, October 24 2016
- Re: The popularization of the term Co-housing Elizabeth Magill, October 24 2016
- Re: The popularization of the term Co-housing R Philip Dowds, October 26 2016
- Re: The popularization of the term Co-housing Kathryn McCamant, October 26 2016
-
Re: The popularization of the term Co-housing Ann Zabaldo, October 22 2016
- Re: The popularization of the term Co-housing Sharon Villines, October 26 2016
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.