Re: re-opening major decisions (WAS senior vs. multigen) | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:40:05 -0800 (PST) |
> On Feb 27, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Eris Weaver <eris [at] erisweaver.info> wrote: > > However, despite the original intent to establish an age restricted > (prospective members limited to 55-75 at application to join) community, > some in the community are now pushing to revisit the possibility of > multigenerational v senior only. > > To me, the key issue here is not really about senior v > multigenerational, but about re-opening major decisions. And I heard a third question — how would things change if we were to do Senior or Multigenerational? How would the community change? Can we change midstream. So I thought the question was about the particulars of each, not what was best or worst. > t is best NOT to re-open > major decisions unless and until there has been a major change in > circumstances OR there is compelling new information. I agree with Eris’s recommendations on this. It’s hard to make decisions that might close out future members, but it is also hard to keep changing decisions, particularly major ones. If you decide on no pets, maybe you will lose households But on the other hand, households have to know what they are committing to. Even if they are not yet committing money, they are committing emotional attachments and time. It’s a commitment will change their lives. If people commit on the basis of having outdoor cats, and then the group changes that policy, what do they do with their 3 life companions? Or having children? Or no children? One option is to be clear about where you are open to options, but get clear about something. Make decisions. It won’t be easier later. Some groups want to wait until everyone is there so they won’t be dominating the decisions. They want a democracy with everyone having a voice. That’s too late. And people will keep changing their minds until the actually move in. You need to begin costing out what various options will require in facilities or site plans long before you have even 70% of your units asked for. What does it mean to have 6 dogs? Should you design for fences? Or a dog run? When we began discussing pets, some wanted to have cats allowed in the CH with litter boxes, etc. But then we added up the cats —13. No one, even the cat owners wanted 13 cats in the CH. One person was fostering 5 cats. (Allergies ultimately ruled any cats out.) Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org
-
re-opening major decisions (WAS senior vs. multigen) Eris Weaver, February 27 2017
- Re: re-opening major decisions (WAS senior vs. multigen) Sharon Villines, February 27 2017
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.