Retrofit Cohousing | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Fred H Olson (fholsoncohousing.org) | |
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 07:48:12 -0800 (PST) |
As a long time advocate of Retrofit Cohousing, it's been interesting to see Alan O'Hashi's Feb 25 webchat (via https://www.cohousing.org/node/6645 **) and recent discussion on Cohousing-L (thread: Re: Tonight's Web Chat on Retrofit Cohousing ) The topic has been discussed periodically on the list over the years and at conference workshops twice that I know of. A search of https://www.cohousing.org gets 4 pages of hits. My old Retrofit Cohousing page is at: http://mn.cohousing.org/retrofit/ I feel the need to make a couple caveats: The Cohousing Glossary on cohousing.org includes: >Retrofit cohousing: A type of cohousing in which neighbors transform >an existing neighborhood over time rather than building from the >ground up and all at once. Retrofit cohousing has the potential to be >more cost effective than developing a brand-new community and can >allow for more opportunities for rental housing in the community . That definition does not make clear that most committed Retrofit Cohousing members move to the community rather than being neighbors who choose to join. This generally means the community can only grow when a current resident moves out making a house available. This makes the development a long term project. Another complication is establishing a common house. Having events at member houses works but is generally not the same as having a neutral space where people can spontaneously spend time informally. Getting close to the 30 households that many believe to be optimal is a challenge. Most retrofit cohousing efforts that I am aware of have been in single family housing which tends to be spread out enough to make this difficult. But it is possible. I agree with Ann Zabaldo in her 25 Feb post that the web site of long time established Retrofit Cohousing community, N Street Cohousing in Davis, CA (19 houses, one of which includes common space) is a good place to start. http://nstreetcohousing.org/about Like regular cohousing development, retrofit cohousing is a big project tho very different. Most proposals probably do not succeed. But the effort to establish retrofit cohousing builds community itself. Both face the major challenge of progressing far enough to be perceived as viable so that people are willing to invest in and commit to the project. One variant is an effort to attempt to organize in an established multifamily housing development to more resemble cohousing. For example an effort here in the Twin Cities in a 67 unit condo building. See https://suitecohousing.wordpress.com/ But again most current residents are unlikely to make cohousing-like relations with neighbors a priority so again growth most likely will be thru recuiting members to move in when units become availalble. But organizing efforts build community... A variant of this that I have been pondering lately is to organize in an existing multiunit cooperative development where the culture is already "cooperative". (I often argue that cohousing is a form of a cooperative. MN is home to many coops.) Despite my preference for multigenerational cohousing I've been looking at senior housing coops since they seem to be so numerous. But it turns out, that is a skewed observation. Of are 121 senior housing coops in the US listed at http://seniorcoopliving.org/directory/ 81 are in MN, most of those are in the Twin Cities and 19 are within a few miles of my house. We have gotten on the waiting list of the nearest one to give us an option. We've attended one "common meal" earlier this month and plan to attend another tonight. About 1/3 of the 160 residents (123 units) attended the first one. Our long time efforts to build "Homewood Cohousing" (a name that represents mostly wishful thinking and is now seldom used) seems very unlikely to ever resemble cohousing much. ( tho my web page about it has not had updates in many years, see: http://mn.cohousing.org/homewood/ We have missed many opportunities when houses became available. We never achieved the perception of viability and have not had a "waiting list". On the other hand we have a great "block club" that meets every other month, has block cleanups and occasional other activities and welcomes new residents. (And doorknocks to warn people there car might get towed when snow is to be plowed...) Fred ** This webchat page can also be found at https://www.cohousing.org via the >Connecting with Cohousing >WebChats menu links -- Fred H. Olson Minneapolis,MN 55411 USA (near north Mpls) Email: fholson at cohousing.org 612-588-9532 My Link Pg: http://fholson.cohousing.org
- Re: Retrofit Cohousing, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Retrofit Cohousing Muriel Kranowski, December 13 2013
- Re: retrofit cohousing Patrice Crotty, October 17 2021
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.