Re: Need Zoning Law Expertise | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Philip Dowds (rphilipdowds![]() |
|
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 10:54:27 -0700 (PDT) |
Cambridge, like San Francisco, Manhattan, and some other US sub-markets, is hyper-wacky on both housing pricing and annual real estate appreciation. Quite a few of us now living in Cambridge can afford it, not because we’re star financial portfolio managers, but because we bought in the 70s, just prior to real estate wackiness. Our City Council and body politic kvetches a lot about the “housing problem”, but does not always see itself as having many levers to pull. We do have “inclusionary zoning”, and indeed, Cornerstone Cohousing itself has four below-market limited equity ownership units. Across the City, our municipal government supports and participates in a variety of State and federal “public housing programs”, to the tune of about 4,000 units. We do have an expectation for high density housing development, and we get a lot of it. Rules about who can live with whom come and go, but currently have little consequence in Cambridge. Disparate families and friends are known to do a lot of doubling up in two- to four-bedroom units formerly considered as single family only. Cambridge has an active Air BnB market, and has recently gone to a rule that Air BnB must be operated by resident owners, not absentee landlords. There is talk at the State level for re-establishing local option rent control enabling legislation, but I will personally be surprised if anything comes of this. To get to the real point: What’s often described as the “housing problem” is really the “income inequality problem”, which has grown ever worse and worse since the federal government dismantled progressive taxation starting in the ’80’s. But that’s a debate for another day. Meanwhile, I remain pretty pessimistic about solving the “housing problem” by seeking out work-arounds for building housing “cheap”. Thanks, Philip Dowds Cornerstone Village Cohousing Cambridge, MA mobile: 617.460.4549 email: rpdowds [at] comcast.net > On Mar 30, 2019, at 12:36 PM, Brian Bartholomew via Cohousing-L <cohousing-l > [at] cohousing.org> wrote: > >> Budget-smart households will buy as much housing as they can afford -- >> and their upper limit on housing expense is the point at which >> housing costs make it impossible to meet the other needs of food, >> clothing, transportation, education and healthcare. > > I looked on Zillow within the last twelve months and no housing was > for sale in Cambridge for under $425K. Using the older sustainable > formulas for max percentage of income to mortgage, that probably means > four professionally employed adults plus a homemaker. For those of us > ordinary people who aren't financial portfolio managers, the only > workable arrangement is denser than the nuclear family. > > Is the Cambridge city council generally allowing this, or banning it? > > Brian > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > >
- Re: Need Zoning Law Expertise, (continued)
- Re: Need Zoning Law Expertise Philip Dowds, March 30 2019
-
Re: Need Zoning Law Expertise Philip Dowds, March 31 2019
- Re: Need Zoning Law Expertise Jenny Guy, April 6 2019
-
Re: Need Zoning Law Expertise Brian Bartholomew, March 30 2019
- Re: Need Zoning Law Expertise Philip Dowds, March 30 2019
-
Re: Need Zoning Law Expertise Brian Bartholomew, March 31 2019
- Re: Need Zoning Law Expertise Philip Dowds, March 31 2019
- Re: Need Zoning Law Expertise David Heimann, April 1 2019
- Re: Need Zoning Law Expertise Brian Bartholomew, April 2 2019
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.