|Re: who finds the coho list nonproblematic?||<– Date –> <– Thread –>|
|From: Maggi (librarymaggigmail.com)|
|Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 13:42:41 -0700 (PDT)|
Absolutely, I agree, this list is incredibly valuable. I've been on it for many years and I continue to refer new members of our community to it. The content is available in archive form for those who don't have time to keep up with it, and it can be found publicly. Those things are hugely important. The people who are here, and who have been here for years and years, are sustaining a vital, essential resource. Thank you to Fred and you, Sharon, and everyone who continue to weigh in on questions. On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 12:11 PM Sharon Villines via Cohousing-L < cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> wrote: > > On Jun 18, 2021, at 6:59 AM, Chris Hansen <itschrishansen [at] gmail.com> > wrote: > > > It’s also created a priceless archive that dates back to before listservs > > were outdated and the users considered ‘fossils’. We may lean > > demographically to the older end of the spectrum, but we also > collectively > > hold some history and the wisdom of experience that should be available > to > > be mined. > > Definitely. In spite of ebooks, real books have not died. They have > features ebooks can’t match, even though ebooks have the definite advantage > of being searchable. > > I love forums for asking specific questions, but not dialogue or forming > relationships. > > The value of this list is immeasurable to cohousing. > > And Fred, too. >
- Re: who finds the coho list nonproblematic? Alan O'Hashi, June 17 2021
- Re: who finds the coho list nonproblematic? Fred-List manager, June 18 2021
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.