Re: Equal Access [was Dropbox Limit Solution | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: jmcarle (jmcarle![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 14:19:18 -0700 (PDT) |
As far as I've heard, our members don't see it as a significant constraint. Anyone who has their own professional dropbox membership can usually include the community archive space in their accessed directories. Those who prefer to stick with the free dropbox membership can access (open and save files on) the smaller directories for active files and contact one of the members with professional memberships to access files on the larger directories for them as needed. The limitation of one person for the community dropbox membership has little consequence. I suppose we could subscribe to a more expensive team dropbox account (more space and unlimited users at a $/user/mo fee) and recoup it through HOA fees if folks express concern later. -----Original Message----- From: Cohousing-L <cohousing-l-bounces+jmcarle=gmail.com [at] cohousing.org> On Behalf Of Sharon Villines via Cohousing-L Sent: Monday, May 16, 2022 1:24 PM To: Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> Cc: Sharon Villines <sharon [at] sharonvillines.com> Subject: [C-L]_ Equal Access [was Dropbox Limit Solution > On May 16, 2022, at 11:27 AM, <jmcarle [at] gmail.com> <jmcarle [at] > gmail.com> wrote: > > The community purchases a "Dropbox Professional" membership for > $199/year + tax. It seems to allow one user to manage the 3TB of > space, though users with full access to both directories are able to > access and save to it at will. This is one of the limitations of many internet-based services — they limit access to 1-3 or so people. In cohousing, in the same way many communities have everyone on the Board, I like everyone to have access. Unless someone could destroy the system by making a mistake, shared ownership and access establishes equivalence and responsibility. It trusts everyone equally. When we were using Google Sites for our wiki, they changed the plan so only one person could be an owner. It made me feel very uncomfortable, and others as well, because it felt exclusive. I know one of the issues of access is security. If I am hosting dozens of hundreds of websites, then I have to be concerned about security for all the websites I host. But in terms of energy or complexity, how much is involved in allowing all the users to have access? In terms of watts or gigs or how ever you measure website intensity. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Takoma Village Cohousing, Washington DC http://www.takomavillage.org _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://L.cohousing.org/info
- Re: Why do you need Archives?, (continued)
- Re: Why do you need Archives? Sandi Goldie, May 16 2022
-
Re: Dropbox Limit Solution Barbara Scott, May 15 2022
- Re: Dropbox Limit Solution jmcarle, May 16 2022
- Equal Access [was Dropbox Limit Solution Sharon Villines, May 16 2022
- Re: Equal Access [was Dropbox Limit Solution jmcarle, May 16 2022
- Re: Equal Access [was Dropbox Limit Solution Henning Mortensen, May 16 2022
- Re: Community Communications Systems [was Equal Access [was Dropbox Limit Solution Sharon Villines, May 17 2022
- Re: Community Communications Systems [was Equal Access [was Dropbox Limit Solution Henning Mortensen, May 17 2022
- Re: Community Communications Systems [was Equal Access [was Dropbox Limit Solution Sharon Villines, May 18 2022
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.