Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Ross Andrew Simons (rasimons1![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 18:31:08 -0700 (PDT) |
Very interesting. Do you think walk-out basement / in-law style apartments would be a way of getting around that? Two of our tenets are “mixed income affordability” and “multigenerational diversity”, and walkout basement rental units within owner-occupied homes feels like a good way to achieve both. Rental helps offset the cost of ownership for lower- to middle-income members, while also bringing in residents who aren’t at the place in life to be able to buy. Would renting out a basement apartment count as a separate dwelling or could it feasibly fall under renting a room within an owner occupied home? On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 2:37 PM Kathryn McCamant < kmccamant [at] cohousing-solutions.com> wrote: > Yes, you can not get the best mortgage rates if there are more than 50% > rentals in an HOA, per Fannie Mae. I have heard of communities that had a > harder time getting the most competitive mortgage rates when they hit 25% > rentals. New California law requires all condo developments to allow up to > 25% rentals….so there you go! The magic number is no more than 25% > non-Owner occupied homes in your community. This has no impact on renting > rooms within an owner occupied homes. > > Katie > -- > Kathryn McCamant, President > CoHousing Solutions > Nevada City, CA 95959 > T.530.478.1970 C.916.798.4755 > www.cohousing-solutions.com > > From: cohousing-l <cohousing-l-bounces+kmccamant= > cohousing-solutions.com [at] cohousing.org> on behalf of Sophie Rubin < > yophiest [at] gmail.com> > Reply-To: Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> > Date: Monday, July 3, 2023 at 9:50 AM > To: Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] cohousing.org> > Cc: Bonnie Fergusson <fergyb2 [at] yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [C-L]_ Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords > > Yeah after doing a bit of research it looks like it can be hard for buyers > to get a mortgage if more than 50% of the complex is rentals, or if more > than 10% of units are owned by the same person/entity. > > This leads me to think a subdivision structure would be better - more > security for buyers and less weird red tape for the rental LLC. Of course > getting subdivisions approved is it’s own can of worms. > > Anyone’s cohousing structures as a subdivision instead of a condominium > association? > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: > http://L.cohousing.org/info > > > > -- [image: linkedin] <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rasimons1/> [image: instagram] <https://www.instagram.com/rsimons1/> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rasimons1/> Ross Andrew Simons Marketing & Hospitality Professional (617) 824-0117 rasimons1 [at] gmail.com
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords, (continued)
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Hafidha Sofia, July 3 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Bonnie Fergusson, July 3 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Sophie Rubin, July 3 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Kathryn McCamant, July 6 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Ross Andrew Simons, July 6 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Sharon Miller, July 7 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Philip Dowds, July 7 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Joyce Cheney, July 7 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Sharon Villines, July 7 2023
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.