Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Bonnie Fergusson (fergyb2![]() |
|
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 08:35:40 -0700 (PDT) |
One reason for limiting rentals is that banks sometimes won’t issue mortgages if the percent of units that are rented is too high in a community. This can make it hard for owners to sell their units. Our experience with renters has been mostly very good, high community participation and several times long term renters have ended up buying into the community when another unit becomes available. Which is a great result for all concerned. Bonnie FergussonSwans Market CohousingOakland, CA Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad On Monday, July 3, 2023, 7:58 AM, Hafidha Sofia <hafidhaao [at] gmail.com> wrote: Yes, Sophie. Songaia Cohousing has done such a thing. It wasn't part of the initial design, but an adaptation. A group of 6-7 members formed an LLC to purchase one of the houses that was being built by a developer on an adjacent property. The intention was to provide housing for people who couldn't purchase. (The community was at capacity. Owners rarely sold and adding more dwellings to the land wasn't an option.) The very large house is rented by room. When I lived there, I rented two bedrooms and an office space; there were three additional bedrooms rented out. The first wave of renters included two members of the LLC. They had invested money to purchase the house and also paid rent to live there. For the LLC owners it was an investment they got a return on; it is also a fair amount of work. They have to manage the property and tenants, which is a part-time job. I'm curious about models of cohousing community that build rental units in mind from the start - with ownership and management coming from the cohousing community. A sort of hybrid cooperative, where revenue goes back into community. I think Canticle Farm in Oakland does something like this. The homes are purchased by or donated to the 501(c)3. Canticle operates as a non-profit. My understanding is all houses are shared houses, not single family. But there are families there! It is a vibrant, lively community. hafidha > On Jul 2, 2023, at 2:35 PM, Sophie Rubin <yophiest [at] gmail.com> wrote: > > [trimmed text - the following is an excerpt] > To address the issue that Sharon brought up about people getting attached > and renters having to leave: are there communities that have some owned and > some rental units? Like via an LLC associated with the community that owns > the rentals, not individual landlords? Then the rentals could be structured > to favor long-term renters without them risking displacement. More > stability for the community and for the renters themselves. And more > economic diversity for the community. > > [trimmed] > > Sophie Rubin > _________________________________________________________________ Cohousing-L mailing list -- Unsubscribe, archives and other info at: http://L.cohousing.org/info
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords, (continued)
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Sharon Villines, July 2 2023
-
Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Sharon Villines, July 2 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Sophie Rubin, July 2 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Hafidha Sofia, July 3 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Bonnie Fergusson, July 3 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Sophie Rubin, July 3 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Kathryn McCamant, July 6 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Ross Andrew Simons, July 6 2023
- Re: Limits on rentals with or without absentee landlords Sharon Miller, July 7 2023
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.