Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sharon Villines (sharon![]() |
|
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 09:03:24 -0700 (PDT) |
> On Jul 21, 2025, at 9:29 AM, R Philip Dowds via Cohousing-L <cohousing-l [at] > cohousing.org> wrote: > > I may have a different take on the significance of the founding role. > Because it’s not scalable into the future. I also think that founding members are different than later adds. By founding I think of those who first moved in and lived through learning how to manage property and hold others accountable (if that is ever possible). The reason the criteria can't be the same is that most communities are not close enough to an established community to have a good sense of what cohousing is. They are signing on to what they think they would like and designing a system that they think will work. So initially, it’s a wing and a prayer. But it’s also a time for learning a lot about people and what they think cooperation is and how interested they are in self-governance. At Takoma Village the year the Resales and Rental Pod formed was the year they realized that there were likely to be 7-8 resales in the next few months and that we had become very desirable. Essentially we needed to protect ourselves from people who had the money and thought it would be cool to say they lived in cohousing — and never lift a finger. One thing about having an active waiting list is that those who are really interested get involved earlier and hit the ground running. They attend workdays and meals more often and are often well known to residents who are about to move. And other members who have worked with them on workdays can share their recommendations. > Today, cohousing in America is still a micro-cult activity: Only a tiny > fraction of USA residents live in cohousing, or can even find cohousing > nearby. But I like to picture a future where most small towns have several > cohousing communities, and cities have dozens or hundreds. Yes, some > candidate cohousers will always choose to find each other, to learn how to be > real estate developers, and to create their own brand of brand new community. > But many others will simply shop around, and select an existing community > that best serves their lifestyle. As I announced a few months ago I have moved into a "senior village” that is quite large. There are 4 neighborhoods each with 4 residential buildings around a clubhouse or commons. All the buildings are connected by enclosed walkways — the walk through all of them is a bit more than a mile. Facilities in the clubhouses include a casual and a more uppity dining venue. So residents have the choice of 8 restaurants. Not all are open for all meals and there are buffets on weekends and special cookouts on holidays and some Fridays. There is another building with assisted living and memory care and a medical and wellness building with a pool. The community has about 3,000 members including staff and residents. And more than 200 clubs or teams. Some play games, discuss books, movie clubs, crafts, computer groups, and my favorite, a group that will help you plan a party. They promise that they are experts at ending parties at 9:30 unless otherwise appropriate like on New Year’s Eve. My other favorite is a list of people who will help with opening jars and things like that. Anyone who wants to form a group just announces it and if people join, they have a club. They also plan trips —if there is someplace you want to go whether is New Orleans or Wales, the group will help you plan it, figure out how much it costs, and how many people you need to make it affordable. If people sign up you have a trip. There are also work groups who take responsibility for composting, running the resale shop to benefit the benevolent fund, and do other cohousing like tasks. The community is managed by a large not for profit organization, Erikson. Some staff work for Erikson and some work for Riderwood. The community has alliances with a community college, a high school, and an elementary school. The benevolent fund raises money for school uniforms for the elementary school and hires the college and high school kids to work, and awards scholarships. The social and political concerns would be right at home in cohousing. There are complaints that the management company doesn’t listen to them, but I think the real weakness is that many of the residents don’t know how to coordinate in order to clealy formulate and state their preferences to the management company. The most recent example was a plan to replace a long defunct outdoor swimming pool with a stage for outdoor music. The residents who lived by the covered pool objected to the idea of outdoor music and to the removal of trees and to the probable loss of songbirds. Forums were arranged, one for the people who lived close by and another for everyone. There were loud statements about boycotting the meetings because it was playing into the hands of the dictators. Others kept a close eye to be sure the announcement of the meetings got to everyone. So it was the naysayers vs the good governance people who were going to be there full force with a written statement of concerns — one they circulated on the community email list for suggestions and corrections. The meetings went perfectly well. The Erickson people had done the plans in order to show their idea clearly and quickly ditched the most objectionalble ideas — outdoor music performances and artificial grass. As often happens, the planners did not take into account that the village is surrounded by 200 acres of trees. And they want to introduce artificial grass? “Oh” was the response. The meeting went very well and the discussion will go on until there is a level of consensus. One thing that made me question how old the planners were was their statement that they were building for the future. Young people now are used to having large outdoor music concerts and “we have to be ready for them.” I thought that was a strange statement since everyone here now knows full well about Woodstock (a few decades ago) and a million other concerts in parks, and is still saying but not under my balcony. People aged 80 are not so wild about the things they were wild about at 20 or 30. Or even 40. Riderwood is the same age as Takoma Village so some have been here 25 years. Many for 10-15 years. There are 25 people over the age of 100 and the Nifty Nineties gather every month. I’ve been surprised at how happy I am to be in groups of people who are all my age. There is something calming about it that I hadn’t expected. We have whole lifetimes of shared history and experiences. I have a small dinner group on Mondays — 4 of 7 or so people show up every week. A neighbor named Peggy seems to have a meal group for almost every meal — different people. She’s been here 15 years. People organize around interests and also organize around the needs of all the residents to be sure Riderwood knows about everyone who may have needs. There is plenty of interaction and sharing and cooperative activity. I love it that I feel less burdened with not being able to do all the work I needed to have done to live comfortably in cohousing. Here the essentials are taken care of. Which is the scale problem with cohousing. I have seen the hard workers get burned out repeatedly at Takoma Village. It isn’t enough to say, "Well if you are working too hard, just stop.” Because then things would sink to the lowest common denominator. The size of Riderwood makes so many options available and affordable. I imagine having, as Philip suggests, 4 or 5 linked cohousing communities. With areas designed for different age groups and mixed age groups. People can choose to live wherever they choose. To develop such a complex would take a major developer group but there would be many advantages. One being at least some full-time paid staff. And the ability to hire companies that only do large jobs. The windows in my building were just replaced and everyone was dreading it. But it was done in such an organized fashion it was totally painless. The replacement company had people who specialized in each step of the process and they worked efficiently one right after the other. They first took pictures so they could put everything back that would be moved away from the windows. They used those poles to create a hallway of plastic curtains and enclosed the area by the windows. Not a spec of dust when they left. But it was a major operation. A condo of 25-35 units couldn’t afford to hire that kind of work. And I think we have run out of DIY people who want to jump in and do everything themselves. I’m still trying to understand how Riderwood produces so many meals fresh everyday. The menus partially change every month and there are daily and weekly specials and there are at least 20 options for each meal. It’s been so long since I have eaten home made applesauce that I was surprised that it tasted like apples. They cook almost everything from scratch. And one day my Reuben sandwich was missing the cheese. And yesterday’s curried lentil soup with vegetables didn’t have any lentils — may be 2 or 3 — but I could have sent it back and not hurt anyone’s feelings. Sharon ---- Sharon Villines Riderwood Village, Silver Spring MD
- Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale?, (continued)
- Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? Muriel Kranowski, July 21 2025
- Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? rlkohl, July 22 2025
- Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? R Philip Dowds, July 23 2025
- Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? Sharon Villines, July 23 2025
- Re: Cohesiveness of community after a sale? Sharon Villines, July 22 2025
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.