| # adults/common costs | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Judy (BAXTER%55317 |
|
| Date: Wed, 10 Nov 93 16:56 CST | |
re: Jim's comment about considering adults vs humans-
"I'm not suggesting I _know_ what the _best way_ to allocate commons cost
is. But I wonder why the number of _adults_ instead of the number of _human
beings_ would be the appropriate measure of a family's responsibility for
cost sharing. (Or even the number of _mammals_?) "
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I guess our rationale on using # adults rather than # humans is to encourage
rather than discourage families w/ kids. As far as I remember.
And I find Nancy's comments on costs very interesting. Now that we have some
large units to cnsider, I suspect MOCOCO may revise its formula. It 's very
very hard to decide what is FAIR.
JUdy
Judy Baxter, Monterey Cohousing Community, Twin Cities Area, Mpls/St.Paul MN
(Mococo) baxter%epivax [at] vx.cis.umn.edu
Twin Cities CoHousing Network Voice Mail 612-930-7580
Voice Mail for Monterey Cohousing - 612-930-7554
-
# adults/common costs Judy, November 10 1993
- Re: # adults/common costs Jim Ratliff, November 10 1993
- Re: # adults/common costs phalpern, November 17 1993
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.