Re: Why not? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Jim Ratliff (jratliff![]() |
|
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 93 16:30 CST |
On 4:10 PM 11/12/93 -0600, Trey Wedge wrote: > My <naive> impression was that the attraction of co-housing is > economy... [...] > So, if there is no economy in this approach, again, why do it? [...] > For that matter, what are the advantages of cohousing that are > unavailable in conventional housing? Conventional housing is not designed to foster community, rather it's designed to foster a "my home is my castle--stay out of my space" attitude. Cohousing intentionally creates spatial/temporal patterns which facilitate interaction among community members. Compare that to typical suburban life where people drive home from work, activate the remote control for their automatic-opening garage door, drive in (with the door shutting behind them), and then entering their house without seeing their neighbors. Sharing meals is a SIGNIFICANT difference between cohousing and any conventional neighborhood. ___ | \_|IM RATLIFF Tucson Cohousing jratliff [at] bpa.Arizona.edu
-
Re: Why not? Jim Ratliff, November 12 1993
-
RE: Why not? Elise Matthesen, November 12 1993
- Why not? Jerry Callen, November 12 1993
- Re: Why not? Robert Hartman, November 12 1993
- Re: Why not? Jim Ratliff, November 12 1993
-
RE: Why not? Elise Matthesen, November 12 1993
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.