Re: An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Anna Yamada (rosaphil![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 93 07:54 CST |
The only problem with that is that developers work for profit and charge according to schedule and are rather unflexible once the last plan is submitted and work has started. Any group or individual can register oneself as an interior decorator, get a wholesalers buyer tax stamp, deal directly with the suppliers, do most of the work oneself, rent the equipment for heavy work and contract directly with the operator of the heavy machinery for cheaper viz directly, and get a group ethos and feeling of responsability for the project going that probably would make for a better-built and designed thing. It's always handy to have an architect, a lawyer, and an electrician & carpenter as part of one's co-housing crew.
- Re: An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal, (continued)
- Re: An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal Fred H Olson -- WB0YQM, November 11 1993
-
RE: An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal BARANSKI, November 12 1993
- RE: An alternative to the coho dev. ordeal Nancy Wight, November 12 1993
-
An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal Jim Kingdon, November 14 1993
- Re: An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal Anna Yamada, November 18 1993
- Re: An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal david sucher, November 18 1993
- Re: An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal Robert Hartman, November 15 1993
- Re: An alternative to the cohousing development ordeal Pablo Halpern, November 17 1993
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.