Re: Rules, norms, and compromise | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Rob Sandelin (robsan![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 94 18:11 CDT |
Stuart Staniford-Chen stated: We often create policy which solves some problem at a meeting but doesn't really work, or is attempting to solve some problem which doesn't actually exist, but people feared might exist. Such policies often get ignored subsequently. What I would add to this is that a regular (annual?) review of operations can often weed out dead stuff. We are very overdue in this at Sharingwood. (We don't always practice what I preach - learn from our mistakes). Also rules, policies, operations which everyone "agrees to" but subsequently get ignored can be a sign of false consensus where no one wanted to really speak against the idea so they just went along with it. People also forget what they agree to (I do this all the time - Oh yeah, we're going to the opera tonight.....). If you do a review these things come to light and you can deal with em, punt em to committee (at Sharingwood that usually means they die of neglect) or reanimate them. At Sharingwood we hold an annual meeting for this kind of stuff where we also elect new board members, evaluate if we met any of the goals we set last year, set new goals to ignore, do other weird and funny rituals, and eat potluck sugar goodies. At Sharingwood the things people really care about get reminded to those who might forget and commit a transgression against the state. Certain types of policification end up buried in meeting minutes and generally lost soon after creation. This is not always a bad thing. One thing I do is to extract policies out of minutes into an agreements doc which I keep more or less up to date with "policy" sorts of decisions. There are copies for handout around the community, posted on Bboards etc. and any prospective members who look like they might throw some money into our bank account get a copy. This way the important stuff stays on top, the trivia sinks to the bottom. Rob Sandelin Saying few things with lots of words again Sharingwood.
-
Rules, norms, and compromise Gordon, September 29 1994
- Re: Rules, norms, and compromise Stuart Staniford-Chen, September 29 1994
- Re: Rules, norms, and compromise Rob Sandelin, September 29 1994
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.